2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Espectrometría de masas matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight vs. metodología convencional en la identificación de Candida no-albicans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was proposed that MS was able to identify rare and hardly identified Candida species that could not be determined by conventional methods [22]. In addition, it was put forwarded that MS was helpful to identification of related subspecies (C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis) [23]. In our study, it was shown that Candida species identified less in comparison with C. albicans such as C. krusei, C. dubliniensis and C. guilliermondii were accurately identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proposed that MS was able to identify rare and hardly identified Candida species that could not be determined by conventional methods [22]. In addition, it was put forwarded that MS was helpful to identification of related subspecies (C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis) [23]. In our study, it was shown that Candida species identified less in comparison with C. albicans such as C. krusei, C. dubliniensis and C. guilliermondii were accurately identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, a few studies evaluated the use of the MALDI-TOF method for yeast identification, reporting performances from 87 to 97.5% by using the manufacturers' extraction and validation recommendations on the Bruker Daltonics system (9,10,12,15,19,22) and from 94.5 to 96.1% with the Shimadzu system (15,23), depending on the panel of yeasts tested (especially for the presence of Cryptococcus, Geotrichum, and Trichosporon in the panel), the version of the database, and on the analysis's inclusion or noninclusion of the nonrepresented species in the database. In the Bruker Daltonics systems, these percentages increased to 96.3 to 98.4% without more misidentifications when a validation score of 1.8 or 1.7 was used (12,16,19,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(n ϭ 73) isolated from noninvasive samples were tested by using the Vitek-2 systems YST and API CAUX, identifying 67 yeast isolates to the species level and 6 to the genus level. Discrepancies were resolved by SeptiFast LightCycler multiplex PCR, C. glabrata-specific PCR, and enzymatic digestion (269).…”
Section: Candida Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%