E-Poster Discussion Abstracts 2019
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-esraabs2019.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESRA19-0226 Comparing analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block versus fascia iliaca block in patients undergoing total hip replacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of bias was unclear in most domains for all ten abstracts. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Of the 42 included studies, eight were assessed as high risk of bias in at least one domain. 13,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Six studies were assessed as low risk of bias in all domains.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The risk of bias was unclear in most domains for all ten abstracts. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Of the 42 included studies, eight were assessed as high risk of bias in at least one domain. 13,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Six studies were assessed as low risk of bias in all domains.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,34,39,40 Thirty-one trials used a predetermined LA volume between 15 and 30 mL per injection. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][21][22][23][24][25][26]28,29,[31][32][33][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] The dosage regimen or the type of LA was not stated in two of the abstracts. 19,20 With respect to LA type, 19 trials used ropivacaine (0.2-0.75%) 12,14,17,18,22,24,27,29,[31][32][33][34][39][40]…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations