1989
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Essay Concerning Color Constancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates reliable perceptual contrast (cf. Abramov & Gordon, 1994;Jameson & Hurvich, 1989). Most important, the interaction, F(1, 15) ϭ 15.48, p Ͻ .001, reveals that the direction of change of the context hue affected detection of the target hue change in the embedded condition, but not in the separated condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result indicates reliable perceptual contrast (cf. Abramov & Gordon, 1994;Jameson & Hurvich, 1989). Most important, the interaction, F(1, 15) ϭ 15.48, p Ͻ .001, reveals that the direction of change of the context hue affected detection of the target hue change in the embedded condition, but not in the separated condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have argued that this dissimilarity-based contrast effect occurs at a decision-making stage and results from the influence of the context stimulus on categorization of the target stimulus (Stewart & Brown, 2004). However, the observed contrast effect could instead involve more low-level perceptual mechanisms, reflecting the well-established color contrast effect (e.g., for review, see Abramov & Gordon, 1994;Jameson & Hurvich, 1989). Thus, the purpose of Experiment 4 was to test whether the effect obtained in the preceding experiments may have been attributable to a lowlevel perceptual contrast.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From that point of view, it may be irrelevant whether the colour appearance of an object does or does not change under a change in illuminant, providing that any changes that do occur can be correctly attributed. Indeed, Jameson and Hurvich (1989) have argued that eliminating the effects of differing illuminants could actually be disadvantageous: the changing colours of a scene could be useful cues to (for example) the weather and the time of day. Some compensation for the colour of the illuminant would be useful, but complete invariance of surface colour may be not only unnecessary, but also possibly undesirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models from this paradigm, in general, describe a fast multiplicative process and both a slow and a fast subtractive process, followed by a static and compressive nonlinearity (e.g., Adelson, 1982;Hayhoe et al, 1987). Also, evidence for both multiplicative and subtractive processes in color appearance have been proposed by studies measuring the effect of the background on a target (induction; Jameson & Hurvich, 1989;Shevell, 1978;Walraven, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%