Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants

Abstract

Integrating sex and gender in health research is essential to produce the best possible evidence to inform health care. Comprehensive integration of sex and gender requires considering these variables from the very beginning of the research process, starting at the proposal stage. To promote excellence in sex and gender integration, we have developed a set of metrics to assess the quality of sex and gender integration in research proposals. These metrics are designed to assist both researchers in developing proposals and reviewers in making funding decisions. We developed this tool through an iterative three-stage method involving 1) review of existing sex and gender integration resources and initial metrics design, 2) expert review and feedback via anonymous online survey (Likert scale and open-ended questions), and 3) analysis of feedback data and collective revision of the metrics. We received feedback on the initial metrics draft from 20 reviewers with expertise in conducting sex- and/or gender-based health research. The majority of reviewers responded positively to questions regarding the utility, clarity and completeness of the metrics, and all reviewers provided responses to open-ended questions about suggestions for improvements. Coding and analysis of responses identified three domains for improvement: clarifying terminology, refining content, and broadening applicability. Based on this analysis we revised the metrics into the Essential Metrics for Assessing Sex and Gender Integration in Health Research Proposals Involving Human Participants, which outlines criteria for excellence within each proposal component and provides illustrative examples to support implementation. By enhancing the quality of sex and gender integration in proposals, the metrics will help to foster comprehensive, meaningful integration of sex and gender throughout each stage of the research process, resulting in better quality evidence to inform health care for all.

The role of exercise in improving patient‐reported outcomes in individuals on dialysis: A scoping review

“…In addition, as observed with exercise participation in the general population, there was a substantially lower proportion of women participating in the studies included in this review as compared to men. Future research should focus on trial designs and enrolment procedures that will encourage and facilitate the enrolment of more female participants as well as the development of strategies to increase physical activity behavior in female dialysis patients …”

“…Future research should focus on trial designs and enrolment procedures that will encourage and facilitate the enrolment of more female participants as well as the development of strategies to increase physical activity behavior in female dialysis patients. 41 In conclusion, although evidence for the benefits of exercise to HRQOL is accumulating, research characterizing the effects of exercise on other PROs in dialysis is scarce. Patients on dialysis and their caregivers have identified the importance of addressing PROs such as dialysis-related symptoms, quality of life, functional status, ability to work, and disability as research outcomes in future studies.…”

Approaches to considering sex and gender in continuous professional development for health and social care professionals: An emerging paradigm

“…In terms of developing approaches in keeping with integrated knowledge translation (iKT) principles, a comprehensive metric for assessing sex-and-gender integration in research projects has been developed by Day et al (2017) that includes detailed scales on data analysis, data reporting, KT planning and patient engagement.…”

Drug Therapy and Frailty: Chicken or the Egg?

“…Considering sex and gender may add to our understanding and lead to the development of more tailored interventions specific to the needs of women and men. 10,11 The studies by Shmuel 4 and Cil 5 and colleagues both demonstrate an association between drug prescribing and frailty. Yet, we are still left with a chicken or egg scenario, not knowing whether drug therapy or frailty came first.…”

“…Without stratifying by sex, valuable information was lost. Considering sex and gender may add to our understanding and lead to the development of more tailored interventions specific to the needs of women and men …”