2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing and evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in human tissue

Abstract: Background Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is caused by metacestode larva of the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis. AE diagnostics currently rely on imaging techniques supported by serology, but unequivocal detection of AE is difficult. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods to detect tapeworm DNA in biopsies have been suggested for several species, no validated protocol adhering to accepted guidelines has so far been presented for AE diagnostics. We herein established a PCR protocol for metace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of Echinococcus-negative samples, multiband patterns appeared on the agarose gels, but the sequenced PCR products were the result of human DNA amplification, certainly due to cross-reaction with the host-DNA during PCR. This phenomenon was previously described by Grimm et al and attributed to a large amount of host cell DNA present in the DNA extract [13]. Moreover, from our study, the use of pure positive controls, isolated from distinct parasite specimens from the host (adult worms and protoscoleces) is confirmed for proper interpretation of results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cases of Echinococcus-negative samples, multiband patterns appeared on the agarose gels, but the sequenced PCR products were the result of human DNA amplification, certainly due to cross-reaction with the host-DNA during PCR. This phenomenon was previously described by Grimm et al and attributed to a large amount of host cell DNA present in the DNA extract [13]. Moreover, from our study, the use of pure positive controls, isolated from distinct parasite specimens from the host (adult worms and protoscoleces) is confirmed for proper interpretation of results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given the mean time interval between storage and DNA extraction, greater DNA degradation is likely the cause of the absence of amplification. Nucleic acids extracted from paraffin blocks are highly degraded in blocks stored more than 4 years, because DNA stability in conserved FFPE material decreases [ 13 ], with residual fragments of mostly < 300 bp, formation of DNA-protein crosslinks, increasing the sensitivity of DNA to mechanical stress and decrease the accessibility for enzymes. When formalin is oxidized to formic acid, DNA depurination and DNA strand breaks can be observed [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed a significant difference between recent and older FFPE samples. The storage time of FFPE samples is critical for PCR results, as previously observed, with a large decrease in PCR performance after four to five years of storage [14,19]. Moreover, the sensitivity of the technique on FFPE samples may be linked to the macroscopic selection of the parasitic zone followed by the extraction of DNA from this zone, as in the estimation of the percentage of tumour cells presenting mutations in pathology examinations [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further assays using higher DNA volumes were not attempted because of the lack of available left-DNA sample. Moreover, these samples, for which the DNA was extracted >5 years after paraffin inclusion could have become highly degraded during storage, as previously described [14,19], and could hinder echinococcosis diagnosis, especially in cases of diagnostic wandering. An association with other PCR techniques may be necessary in such particular cases with degraded DNA, such as the multiplex PCR assay described by Trachsel et al [37] and the Em-rrn qPCR assay used with success on old samples [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PCR has been developed following the demand for molecular detection to diagnose Echinococcus in increasing application areas, such as hydatid disease detection of human and animal, epidemiological investigation, as well as genotyping of Echinococcus, etc. (Armua-Fernandez et al, 2011;Soares et al, 2013;Avcioglu et al, 2017;He et al, 2017;Bittencourt-Oliveira et al, 2018;Gorgani-Firouzjaee et al, 2019;Moradi et al, 2019;Ohiolei et al, 2019;Wan et al, 2020;Grimm et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conventional Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%