Establishing research priorities in prevention and control of vector-borne diseases in urban areas: a collaborative process

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2015, following a call for proposals from the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), six scoping reviews on the prevention and control of vector-borne diseases in urban areas were conducted. Those reviews provided a clear picture of the available knowledge and highlighted knowledge gaps, as well as needs and opportunities for future research. Based on the research findings of the scoping reviews, a concept mapping exercise was undertaken to produce a list of priority research needs to be addressed.MethodsMembers of the six research teams responsible for the “VEctor boRne DiseAses Scoping reviews” (VERDAS) consortium’s scoping reviews met for 2 days with decision-makers from Colombia, Brazil, Peru, Pan-American Health Organization, and World Health Organization. A total of 11 researchers and seven decision-makers (from ministries of health, city and regional vector control departments, and vector control programs) completed the concept mapping, answering the question: “In view of the knowledge synthesis and your own expertise, what do we still need to know about vector-borne diseases and other infectious diseases of poverty in urban areas?” Participants rated each statement on two scales from 1 to 5, one relative to ‘priority’ and the other to ‘policy relevance’, and grouped statements into clusters based on their own individual criteria and expertise.ResultsThe final map consisted of 12 clusters. Participants considered those entitled “Equity”, “Technology”, and “Surveillance” to have the highest priority. The cluster considered the most important concerns equity issues, confirming that these issues are rarely addressed in research on vector-borne diseases. On the other hand, the “Population mobility” and “Collaboration” clusters were considered to be the lowest priority but remained identified by participants as research priorities. The average policy relevance scores for each of the 12 clusters were roughly the same as the priority scores for all clusters. Some issues were not addressed during the brain-storming. This is the case for governance and for access and quality of care.ConclusionsBased on this work, and adopting a participatory approach, the concept mapping exercise conducted collaboratively with researchers from these teams and high-level decision-makers identified research themes for which studies should be carried out as a priority.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40249-018-0463-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) 2021: User involvement in diabetes care, prevention and research

“…Like a Delphi process, GCM can create consensus (e.g. about research gaps) that can be summarized with statistics in tables and text 8,9 . Unlike a standard Delphi process, a GCM exercise also creates a visual concept map reflecting themes in the statement sample that may support deliberation and engagement between stakeholders.…”

Towards a better integration of social sciences in arbovirus research and decision-making: an experience from scientific collaboration between Cuban and Quebec institutions

“…The team from IPK presented the results of intervention, replication, and dissemination studies on empowerment strategies for dengue prevention conducted in Cuba (19,23). IRSPUM conducted a pre-congress introductory course on scoping reviews and built on research priorities concerning vector-borne diseases in urban settings that resulted from an international collaboration project for knowledge synthesis (24). Finally, at the Cuban Health Convention (April 2018), we organized two round tables: Facing arbovirus: lessons learned from social research and How to impact from social science research the decision-making on arboviruses.…”