2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ths.2010.5655036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing traveler identity using collective identity resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identity resolution has been used effectively to evaluate customers, and their interests, in the marketing sector and examine travel records but there are few implementations in the field of policing and criminal fraud detection [1]. Duplicate and false identity records are present in databases and electronic systems because of a lack of validation of data attributes or verification during data entry processes [2].…”
Section: A Identity Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identity resolution has been used effectively to evaluate customers, and their interests, in the marketing sector and examine travel records but there are few implementations in the field of policing and criminal fraud detection [1]. Duplicate and false identity records are present in databases and electronic systems because of a lack of validation of data attributes or verification during data entry processes [2].…”
Section: A Identity Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six further key attributes are then compared using differing comparisons and distance measures (summarised in Table II). These include the crime reference number in the record (x1), which is used to see if identities have been involved in the same crime, yielding a result of either a direct match (1) or no match (0). The role type (x2) the identity played in the crime (either a defendant or victim) were compared in the same way as either a match (1) or no match (0).…”
Section: Rule-based Scoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%