2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geog.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and analysis of global gridded Tm − Ts relationship model

Abstract: Available online xxx Keywords:Zenith wet delay Precipitable water vapor Ground-based GPS meteorology Weighted mean temperature Gridded Tm À Ts model a b s t r a c tIn ground-based GPS meteorology, Tm is a key parameter to calculate the conversion factor that can convert the zenith wet delay (ZWD) to precipitable water vapor (PWV). It is generally acknowledged that Tm is in an approximate linear relationship with surface temperature Ts, and the relationship presents regional variation. This paper employed slidi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HGPT model follows the time-segmentation concept and was based on 20 years of 0.25° × 0.25° spatial resolution and 1-h temporal resolution data from the ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis model. Lan et al [55] calculated linear regression coefficients between T m and T s at every 2 • × 2.5 • grid point using T s data from the ERA-Interim model and T m data from Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS), and compared the results with the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) and radiosonde data to obtain accuracies of 3.1 and 3.8 K, respectively. When compared with our results, we obtained a global accuracy improvement of about 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HGPT model follows the time-segmentation concept and was based on 20 years of 0.25° × 0.25° spatial resolution and 1-h temporal resolution data from the ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis model. Lan et al [55] calculated linear regression coefficients between T m and T s at every 2 • × 2.5 • grid point using T s data from the ERA-Interim model and T m data from Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS), and compared the results with the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) and radiosonde data to obtain accuracies of 3.1 and 3.8 K, respectively. When compared with our results, we obtained a global accuracy improvement of about 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar analysis for temperature, we found a global standard deviation of 1.5 K, and assuming there was no error in α and β (see Equation (6)), we obtained a global T m uncertainty of 1.1 K with a maximum value of 3.5 K over the Atlantic Ocean, close to the Amazon Rainforest (Figure 9). Lan et al [55] calculated linear regression coefficients between and at every 2° × 2.5° grid point using data from the ERA-Interim model and data from Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS), and compared the results with the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) and radiosonde data to obtain accuracies of 3.1 and 3.8 K, respectively. When compared with our results, we obtained a global accuracy improvement of about 33%.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For decades, several methods have been studied, such as radiosondes and water vapor radiometers, sun photometers and GPS (Campmany et al, 2010;Ciesielski et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2013;Perez-Ramirez et al, 2014;Li et al, 2016). Compared with the traditional water vapor observations, ground-based GPS water vapor measurement has the advantages of high accuracy, high spatial-temporal resolution, all-weather availability and low-cost (Haase et al, 2003;Pacione and Vespe, 2008;Lee et al, 2010;Means, 2013;Lu et al, 2015). Ground-based GPS water vapor products, mainly including precipitable water vapor (PWV), are widely used in many fields such as real-time vapor monitoring, weather and climate research, and numerical weather prediction (NWP) (Van Baelen and Penide, 2009;Karabatic et al, 2011;Rohm et al, 2014;Adams et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lan's global gridded model (Lan et al, 2016) is replaced by our static global gridded model because of its much lower spatial resolution(4°×5°) than our model (0.75°×0.75°). Actually Bevis model is established using regional radiosonde data so it should be a regional model, but it has been adopted in many other regional research so we regraded it as a global applicable equation.…”
Section: Assessments Of Ts-tm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%