2006
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.119-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of Mands Following Tact Training as a Function of Reinforcer Strength

Abstract: We examined some conditions under which a response acquired as a tact might facilitate the establishment of a mand. We taught 3 participants with developmental disabilities to tact the items ranked highest and lowest in a preference assessment and subsequently tested to see if the responses occurred as mands. All participants manded for the highly preferred item but rarely manded for the nonpreferred item. These results indicate that, although tact and mand functions are different, conditions can be created to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
63
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
10
63
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Before each condition began, an EO assessment was conducted in which the participant was asked to choose between the high-preference item to be manded or tacted and a low-preference item as identified by the MSWO preference assessment. Choosing the high-preference item helped to ensure the presence of an EO for that item, a necessary condition for a mand (Wallace, Iwata, & Hanley, 2006). If he chose the low-preference item, the session was terminated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before each condition began, an EO assessment was conducted in which the participant was asked to choose between the high-preference item to be manded or tacted and a low-preference item as identified by the MSWO preference assessment. Choosing the high-preference item helped to ensure the presence of an EO for that item, a necessary condition for a mand (Wallace, Iwata, & Hanley, 2006). If he chose the low-preference item, the session was terminated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous programs around the world now emphasize a verbal behavior component as a critical ingredient to their treatment regimen. Furthermore, research on teaching manding, tacting, echoic, and intraverbal behavior, as well as powerful but subtle variables such as automatic reinforcement, is also becoming more common, although still largely restricted to journals devoted to publishing behavior analytic work (e.g., Hernandez, Hanley, ingvarsson, & tiger, 2007;lerman, Parton, Addison, Vorndran, Volkert, & Kodak, 2005;Miguel, Petursdorrit, & carr, 2005;Wallace, iwata, & Hanley, 2006;Wright, 2006;Yi, christian, Vittimberga, & lowenkron, 2006). Moreover, a number of books based in large part on Skinner's analysis are now on the market (e.g., Greer & ross, 2008).…”
Section: What Accounts For the Vitality Of Verbal Behavior?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provided the framework necessary for a functional analysis of human language. The distinction between two of these classes, the mand and the tact, has been the subject of discussion and empirical investigation (Lamarre & Holland, 1985;Murphy & Barnes-Holmes, 2009;Petursdottir, Carr, & Michael, 2005;Schlinger, 2008;Sigafoos, Reichle, Doss, Hall, & Pettitt, 1990;Sundberg, San Juan, Dawdy, & Arguelles, 1990;Wallace, Iwata, & Hanley, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%