2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment patterns of non-native fishes: Lessons from the Duluth–Superior harbor and lower St. Louis River, an invasion-prone Great Lakes coastal ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our simulation results indicated that even at peak ruffe biomass, its impacts on many groups were relatively minor. These results are similar to observations in the St. Louis River estuary, where two decades after the ruffe first invaded there has not been any obvious negative impacts of ruffe on yellow perch or other fishes (Peterson et al 2011). The immediate declines of yellow perch and other native fish populations in the St. Louis River following the ruffe invasion were more likely the result of fluctuations in natural population dynamics rather than interactions with ruffe (Bronte et al 1998).…”
Section: Invasive Species Impacts On the Lake Erie Food Websupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our simulation results indicated that even at peak ruffe biomass, its impacts on many groups were relatively minor. These results are similar to observations in the St. Louis River estuary, where two decades after the ruffe first invaded there has not been any obvious negative impacts of ruffe on yellow perch or other fishes (Peterson et al 2011). The immediate declines of yellow perch and other native fish populations in the St. Louis River following the ruffe invasion were more likely the result of fluctuations in natural population dynamics rather than interactions with ruffe (Bronte et al 1998).…”
Section: Invasive Species Impacts On the Lake Erie Food Websupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our simulations of potential biomass of the three invasive species in Lake Erie were within the ranges observed for those species in other waters. In its native range, ruffe densities vary widely from 0.26 kg ha -1 to 210 kg ha -1 (Kováč 1998), while in in Lakes Superior's St Louis River Estuary, ruffe densities peaked at 1892 individuals ha -1 (* 32 kg ha -1 assuming an average mass of 17 g) soon after establishment (Peterson et al 2011). Killer shrimp biomass reported in European rivers were as high as 50-70 kg ha -1 wet weight (Berezina1 and Ď uriš2 2008).…”
Section: Simulated Equilibrium Biomass Of the Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eDNA results described here constitute a contribution toward a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program and augment the many efforts targeting other species that are based on traditional sampling tools. For example, US Environmental Protection Agency has tested the sampling efficiency of traditional sampling tools for plankton, benthic invertebrates, and fishes (Peterson et al 2011). However, most Great Lakes species surveillance efforts are focused on one or a few species and (or) are geographically narrow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was early evidence that ruffe growth declined as their density increased in the Saint Louis River Harbor [5], but formal analyses of growth related to population density have not been reported for ruffe in North America. Although lengths have been reported along with CPUE (e.g., [35]), aging data, length at age, or growth rates are lacking in population assessments (e.g., [35,36]); these data for ruffe and their competitors would be useful to determine the effects of ruffe in invaded environments.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%