Esthetic considerations when replacing missing maxillary incisors with implants: A clinical report

Petropoulou, Aikaterini; Pappa, Eftychia; Pelekanos, Stavros

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(13)00056-5

Cited by 19 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, only case reports (Vela-Nebot et al 2011;Petropoulou et al 2013) and a No statistically significant differences among DIB (distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact) values were found over the course of 5 years (DIB 1-3 year: P = 0.12; DIB 1-5 year: P = 0.06; DIB 3 -5 year: P = 0.31). retrospective study (Krennmair et al 2011) have been published on this subject since those recommendations were made.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Four‐unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow‐diameter implants – a five‐year case series

Moraguez

Vailati

Grütter

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Four‐unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow‐diameter implants – a five‐year case series

Moraguez

Vailati

Grütter

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Science and technologies guides us to desired results by using the most valuable prove in medicine. [34,35]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socket Shield Technique - A New Approach of Immediate Implant Articles Review

Walid

2019

JDOI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implant restoration is challenging procedure when it involve the esthetics zone, and since implant dentistry is prosthodontically driven procedure, care were practice in restoration of missing teeth in esthetics area which will fulfill the objective. Extraction of teeth leave buccal plate bone unsupported and decrease the blood supply and since this plate is very thin resorption will be expected. Different attempt was done in order to prevent this sequence and create natural emergence profile around dental implant prosthesis. Socket preservation procedures were introduced, however in case of ridge deficiencies, hard and soft tissue augmentation procedures are indicated. Socket shield technique meets the demands of minimal invasion, tissue preservation, and no need of bone substitute materials. And can be applied not only for maintaining buccal contour of an edentulous ridge but also for keeping the inter-implant soft and hard tissue In this review paper we present different articles and case report using socket shield technique as treatment protocols and try to explore different protocol are practice in order to achieve high treatment out come with optimal success.

show abstract

“…Immediate implants placed into central incisors sockets: a surgical and prosthetic two years follow-up INTRoDuCTIoN T he need of tooth extraction due to periodontal or trauma reasons in the maxillary esthetic zone may lead to loss of the buccal alveolar plate following tooth extraction with severe esthetic complications. Immediate placement of dental implants and biomaterial graft into fresh post extraction sockets have been suggested by a great number of authors because it may avoid and preclude dramatic post extraction bone loss [1][2][3][4][5].…”

Section: A S E R E P O R Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate implants placed into central incisors sockets: a surgical and prosthetic two years follow-up

Spyrides

Resende

et al. 2017

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors present a complete surgical and prosthetic case report of a 50-year-old male patient who lost the element 11 by periodontal disease, and during the phase of provisional restorations of the elements 12, 11, 21 and 22 had the element 21 fractured in domestic accident. The roots of the elements 11 and 21 suffered extraction and were replaced in the same act by a conic osseointegrated HE implant measuring 18 X 4 mm and graft of synthetic hydroxyapatite with a three months gap between the two surgical procedures. Six months after the second extraction with replacement of the root of the 21 element by an implant, four individual metal-free ceramic crowns were placed on the elements 12, 11, 21 and 22, two tooth-supported (12, 22) and two implant-supported on custom abutments of zirconia (11, 21), which fully rehabilitated the function and esthetics of the patient with the regeneration and maintenance of bone level and gingival papillae between the elements, due to the strict respect of the biological distances between the individual parts, with monitoring and photographic, radiographic and tomographic documentation previously, during and after the surgery, twenty eight months after the installation of the implant of the 21 element and twenty-one months after the cementing of the four crowns. The authors and the patient signed the Free Informed Consent Form for the presentation of the case which was submitted in accordance with the standards of CONEP. KeywordsMaxillary sockets; Immediate implant; Periodontal failure; Incisor fracture.

show abstract

Esthetic considerations when replacing missing maxillary incisors with implants: A clinical report

Cited by 19 publications

References 16 publications

Four‐unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow‐diameter implants – a five‐year case series

Four‐unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow‐diameter implants – a five‐year case series

Socket Shield Technique - A New Approach of Immediate Implant Articles Review

Immediate implants placed into central incisors sockets: a surgical and prosthetic two years follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About