2021
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.15161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021

Abstract: IMPORTANCE People who have been infected with or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 have reduced risk of subsequent infection, but the proportion of people in the US with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from infection or vaccination is uncertain.OBJECTIVE To estimate trends in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence related to infection and vaccination in the US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn a repeated cross-sectional study conducted each month during July 2020 through May 2021, 17 blood collection organizations with bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

17
181
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
17
181
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter, which had an almost exponential increase with regards to ‘first-dose in’ in the total US population from January 2021 until May 2021, is potentially being responsible for the ongoing exponential increase in June 2021 [ 40 ]. This was also reported among blood donors where, with the onset of vaccinations in December 2020, an exponential increase was seen in overall seroprevalence to > 80% in May 2021, whilst infection-induced seroprevalence plateaued at that time [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter, which had an almost exponential increase with regards to ‘first-dose in’ in the total US population from January 2021 until May 2021, is potentially being responsible for the ongoing exponential increase in June 2021 [ 40 ]. This was also reported among blood donors where, with the onset of vaccinations in December 2020, an exponential increase was seen in overall seroprevalence to > 80% in May 2021, whilst infection-induced seroprevalence plateaued at that time [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The reported COVID-19 prevalence in July 2020 was about 1% [ 40 ], while recent reports suggest a 4.8-fold higher seroprevalence during the first wave of the pandemic [ 46 ]. In fact, a recent serological survey among US blood donors showed a 3.5% seroprevalence in July 2020 [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter which had an almost exponential increase with regards to "first-dose in" in the total US population from 01/2021 until 05/2021 is potentially being responsible for the ongoing exponential increase in 06/2021 [40]. This was also reported among blood donors where with the onset of vaccinations in 12/2020 an exponential increase was seen in overall seroprevalence to over 80% in May 2021, whilst infection-induced seroprevalence plateaued at that time [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although the epidemiological comparison to the US total population [40] is a sub-optimal -yet easily availableindicator of vaccination and COVID-19 convalescence for the actual donor population [47] and given what we observe in individual IVIG lots, an increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer to meet trough levels suggested by Khoury and Cromer et al seems possible. The current maximum NC50 value measured in IVIG/SCIG was 864 IU/mL in 06/2021 and most seroconversions have occurred only recently (keeping in mind the >5-month lead time of IVIG/SCIG production).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation