1967
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183x000700030016x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of General and Specific Combining Ability in F1 Hybrids for Grain Yield and Its Components in Grain Sorghum, Sorghum vulgare Pers.1

Abstract: The performance of 40 F1 hybrid populations of grain sorghum, obtained by crossing each of 5 male‐sterile lines to 8 pollen‐fertility restoring lines, was evaluated from tests conducted at 3 locations over a 2‐year period. Measurements for grain yield, number of heads per plant, weight of 100 seeds, and number of seeds per head were analyzed to obtain estimates of the relative magnitude of general and specific combining effects. Significant differences among general combining ability effects of the lines were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in agreement with findings of Kenga et al (2004) reporting on prevalence of non-additive variance for days to anthesis, plant height, inflorescence length and grain yield per plant. Contrary to our study, earlier works have reported that additive gene effects were a predominant factor determining grain yield in sorghum (Beil and Atkins, 1967;Kirby and Atkins, 1968). The previous studies used breeding lines or previously characterized genotypes with known behaviour in cross.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…These results were in agreement with findings of Kenga et al (2004) reporting on prevalence of non-additive variance for days to anthesis, plant height, inflorescence length and grain yield per plant. Contrary to our study, earlier works have reported that additive gene effects were a predominant factor determining grain yield in sorghum (Beil and Atkins, 1967;Kirby and Atkins, 1968). The previous studies used breeding lines or previously characterized genotypes with known behaviour in cross.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Analysis of general (GCA) and specific (SCA) combining ability for individual experiments was performed, and mean squares of GCA and SCA were used to determine GCA:SCA ratios (Beil and Atkins 1967;Haussmann et al 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCA of any male line was estimated as the deviation of the mean performance of its F1 hybrids with all female parents from the grand mean, and the GCA of any female line was calculated correspondingly. The male × female interaction effect was used to estimate SCA (Beil & Atkins, 1967) although the experimental design did not allow the separation of true SCA from maternal or reciprocal effects, which tend to be small in this species (Gritton, 1975;Samad et al, 1989). The levels of heterosis over the mid-parent or parental average, heterosis over the better parent, superiority over the best parent and inbreeding depression from F1 to F2 were calculated:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%