1959
DOI: 10.2527/jas1959.181323x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters in Beef Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1963
1963
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heritability of this magnitude indicates the considerable genetic improvement which ought to be possible through phenotypic selection for rate of gain. The estimate obtained in this study is higher than an average heritability value for gain in feedlot of 0.53 estimated by sire-offspring regression method that may be calculated from the reports of Knapp and Clark (1950), Knapp and Nordskog (1946), Carter andKincaid (1959), andChambers et al (1960).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heritability of this magnitude indicates the considerable genetic improvement which ought to be possible through phenotypic selection for rate of gain. The estimate obtained in this study is higher than an average heritability value for gain in feedlot of 0.53 estimated by sire-offspring regression method that may be calculated from the reports of Knapp and Clark (1950), Knapp and Nordskog (1946), Carter andKincaid (1959), andChambers et al (1960).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…This difference in estimates from the same body of data could be the result of sampling or of different methods of estimation. Carter and Kincaid (1959) reported 0.22 for heritability of feed conversion calculated from offspring-sire regression. Other estimates obtained by paternal half-sib procedures were 0.22 and 0.32 by Shelby et el.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%