2006
DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature)

Abstract: Abstract. Reactive gases and aerosols are produced by terrestrial ecosystems, processed within plant canopies, and can then be emitted into the above-canopy atmosphere. Estimates of the above-canopy fluxes are needed for quantitative earth system studies and assessments of past, present and future air quality and climate. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) is described and used to quantify net terrestrial biosphere emission of isoprene into the atmosphere. MEGAN is designed for bo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

88
3,530
8
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,156 publications
(3,639 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
88
3,530
8
13
Order By: Relevance
“…After close examination of the underlying data we concluded there was no justification for finer discrimination of emissions rates by PFT, species, or sampling date, location, or season, due to the limited size and high unexplained variability of the data. Table 1 provides a summary of the data for SQT and MT emission factors (EF), including the mean and standard deviation of the EF across plant samples in the four PFT categories, with EF determined using a BER within a canopy environment model (14) at standard conditions with a representative biomass density (gdw m -2 ) for the specified PFT. Since the assumed biomass density for each PFT was a fixed value (500, 750, 500, and 500 gdw m -2 for BT, NT, SB, and GC, respectively (16)), the standard deviations of the EF in Table 1 reflect only the variability in BER across plant samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After close examination of the underlying data we concluded there was no justification for finer discrimination of emissions rates by PFT, species, or sampling date, location, or season, due to the limited size and high unexplained variability of the data. Table 1 provides a summary of the data for SQT and MT emission factors (EF), including the mean and standard deviation of the EF across plant samples in the four PFT categories, with EF determined using a BER within a canopy environment model (14) at standard conditions with a representative biomass density (gdw m -2 ) for the specified PFT. Since the assumed biomass density for each PFT was a fixed value (500, 750, 500, and 500 gdw m -2 for BT, NT, SB, and GC, respectively (16)), the standard deviations of the EF in Table 1 reflect only the variability in BER across plant samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEGANv2.02 driving variables and parametrizations for isoprene have been described previously (14). The MEGANv2.02 approach for MT and SQT is described in this manuscript, and parameters for other compounds will be described elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9 Isoprene is emitted from vegetation and is the single largest source of VOCs to the atmosphere with global emissions of ∼500 Tg C yr −1 . 10 In the atmosphere, isoprene reacts predominantly with OH 11 forming SOA with a yield of 1−4% under low NO x (NO x < 0.1 ppb), 12 1−6% under high NO x (NO x > 1 ppb), 13,14 and up to 29% in the presence of highly acidic seed aerosols, 15 making it an important source of SOA. In smog chamber experiments, SOA yields were observed to be dependent on NO x concentrations, the VOC/NO x ratio, the NO 2 /NO ratio and aerosol acidity, 7,9,13,15 consistent with an anthropogenic−biogenic coupling.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Much effort has gone toward developing parametrizations of VOC emissions from vegetation sources, such as those contained in the model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature (MEGAN). 15,16 While not considered a major global source of terpenoid emissions, soil and leaf litter still contribute significantly to VOCs in the atmosphere, particularly in spring and fall. 17,18 The research focus for soil and litter emissions has been primarily on methanol, acetone, acetaldehyde, and other VOCs with photoproducts that are too volatile to contribute significantly to SOA production.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%