“…After close examination of the underlying data we concluded there was no justification for finer discrimination of emissions rates by PFT, species, or sampling date, location, or season, due to the limited size and high unexplained variability of the data. Table 1 provides a summary of the data for SQT and MT emission factors (EF), including the mean and standard deviation of the EF across plant samples in the four PFT categories, with EF determined using a BER within a canopy environment model (14) at standard conditions with a representative biomass density (gdw m -2 ) for the specified PFT. Since the assumed biomass density for each PFT was a fixed value (500, 750, 500, and 500 gdw m -2 for BT, NT, SB, and GC, respectively (16)), the standard deviations of the EF in Table 1 reflect only the variability in BER across plant samples.…”