2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of primary ejecta and local material for the Orientale basin: Implications for the formation and ballistic sedimentation of multi-ring basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
68
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the incident angle of ejecta was 75°, Oberbeck et al () established an empirical model that can estimate the excavation efficiency ( μ ) of crater ejecta for given thickness of ejecta and the distance from crater center based on the analysis of Copernicus secondary craters (i.e., μ = 4.5 × 10 −5 r 0.87 , all in meters). However, recent works (e.g., Petro & Pieters, ; Xie & Zhu, ) suggested that the authors may have overestimated the excavation efficiency. Here we adopt half of excavation efficiency of Oberbeck et al () (i.e., μ = 2.25 × 10 −5 r 0.87 ) according to the result of Petro and Pieters ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming the incident angle of ejecta was 75°, Oberbeck et al () established an empirical model that can estimate the excavation efficiency ( μ ) of crater ejecta for given thickness of ejecta and the distance from crater center based on the analysis of Copernicus secondary craters (i.e., μ = 4.5 × 10 −5 r 0.87 , all in meters). However, recent works (e.g., Petro & Pieters, ; Xie & Zhu, ) suggested that the authors may have overestimated the excavation efficiency. Here we adopt half of excavation efficiency of Oberbeck et al () (i.e., μ = 2.25 × 10 −5 r 0.87 ) according to the result of Petro and Pieters ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets (i.e., μ = 4.5 × 10 À5 r 0.87 , all in meters). However, recent works (e.g., Petro & Pieters, 2006;Xie & Zhu, 2016) suggested that the authors may have overestimated the excavation efficiency. Here we adopt half of excavation efficiency of Oberbeck et al (1975) (i.e., μ = 2.25 × 10 À5 r 0.87 ) according to the result of Petro and Pieters (2006).…”
Section: /2018je005577mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we discuss an ejecta blanket as a source of regolith. Earlier works showed the scaling law of the external crater profile as a function of distance from the crater rim (Fassett et al, ; McGetchin et al, ; Pike, ; Xie & Zhu, ). We define the thickness profile of the ejecta blanket of a simple crater as (e.g., Pike, ; Sharpton, ) houtσrcrrcκ,0.5emr>rc, where r c is the final crater radius, r is the distance from the crater center, and σ and κ are empirical parameters.…”
Section: Modeling Of Regolith Units As a Source Of Regolithmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fifth ring about 1,300 km in diameter was postulated by some early researchers (Hartmann & Kuiper, 1962;Hartmann & Wood, 1971), but it was poorly defined even if it exists (Moore et al, 1974). There have been controversies about whether the Outer Rook ring (Fassett et al, 2011;Head, 1974;Spudis et al, 1984) or the Inner Rook ring (Xie & Zhu, 2016) is more representative of the position of the transient cavity. The latest study based on high-resolution gravity data from Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) and hydrocode simulation has concluded that the transient crater was~390 km in diameter but was not maintained because of the subsequent gravitation collapse (Johnson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Background Of Investigation Areamentioning
confidence: 99%