1988
DOI: 10.1070/sm1988v059n02abeh003148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of the Singular Numbers of the Carleson Imbedding Operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it works more generally for Schur functions whose image lies in polygon inscribed in the unit disk. This upper bound appears, in a different context and under a very cryptic form, in [19]. First note the following simple lemma.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Lens Maps)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, it works more generally for Schur functions whose image lies in polygon inscribed in the unit disk. This upper bound appears, in a different context and under a very cryptic form, in [19]. First note the following simple lemma.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Lens Maps)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For K, a compact subset of C disjoint from T, and f, a general analytic function in C "K, remarkable results of Parfenov and Prokhorov [29,30] (formerly Gonchar's conjecture) assert that Theorem 1 remains true if supp(+) is replaced in (2.11) by K and lim sup replaced by lim inf . Results of the type given in Theorem 1 and also in the Theorems 3 and 4 have been proved in [15], but there the best rational approximants are defined on a real interval E disjoint from supp(+).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If G is a domain (m = 1), it follows from the result of Zaharjuta and Skiba regarding the n-widths (see [20] and also [9]) that…”
Section: Lemma 8 Let G Be An M-domain and Supposementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Estimate (1.3) is known as Gonchar's conjecture [7]. Parfenov [9] gives a proof of (1.1) and (1.3) for the case where E is a continuum with connected complement. In [12], the second author proves (1.1) and (1.3) for an arbitrary compact set E. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Corollary 2 Suppose E and F Are Disjoint Compact Subsets Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%