2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating above-ground biomass on mountain meadows and pastures through remote sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is impossible to collect all the grassland biomass information within a satellite pixel for constructing the biomass estimation model. A more rational method is to set 3 to 5 quadrats in a pixel, and then average the sampling points to estimate the pixel grassland biomass [16,[32][33][34][35][36]. As a result, spatial scale mismatching occurs between ground-based observation data and satellite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is impossible to collect all the grassland biomass information within a satellite pixel for constructing the biomass estimation model. A more rational method is to set 3 to 5 quadrats in a pixel, and then average the sampling points to estimate the pixel grassland biomass [16,[32][33][34][35][36]. As a result, spatial scale mismatching occurs between ground-based observation data and satellite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation indices of optical satellite imagery such as NDVI (Normalised Differenced Vegetation Index) or EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index) focus on the green vegetation component. A general relationship between vegetative ground cover and pasture biomass exists for low ground cover areas, but when the ground cover is close to 100% the cover-to-mass relationship saturates and reliable estimates are not possible even at low biomass levels [6][7][8]. Investigating this relationship, Hobbs [5] related four vegetation indices to field data and found a breakdown of biomass levels >1000 kg/ha.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developments in remote sensing technologies in recent years have created opportunities to provide faster and cheaper data in larger areas as an alternative to conventional biomass research, which has led many investigators to focus on biomass studies (Todd et al, 1998;Guo et al, 2000;Cho et al, 2007;He et al, 2009;Mundava et al, 2014: Dusseux et al, 2015. In these studies, where both field measurements and remote sensing data are used together, the aim is to investigate the relationship between biomass characteristics of plants and light, and to make biomass estimation in grasslands based on these relationships (Barrachina et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ratio-based Vegetation Indices For Biomass Estimation Dependmentioning
confidence: 99%