2012
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.140939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Allele Age and Selection Coefficient from Time-Serial Data

Abstract: Recent advances in sequencing technologies have made available an ever-increasing amount of ancient genomic data. In particular, it is now possible to target specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in several samples at different time points. Such timeseries data are also available in the context of experimental or viral evolution. Time-series data should allow for a more precise inference of population genetic parameters and to test hypotheses about the recent action of natural selection. In this manuscript,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
304
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
304
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, it seems that dynamic data should provide researchers with more power to detect and quantify selective forces while avoiding the assumptions of stationarity that are required for many inference techniques based on static samples (Sawyer and Hartl 1992;Boyko et al 2008;Desai and Plotkin 2008). Nonetheless, the behavior and power of inference techniques based on time series data have not been thoroughly investigated.There is a well-developed literature on inferring population sizes from genetic time-series data, assuming neutrality (Pollak 1983;Waples 1989;Williamson and Slatkin 1999;Wang 2001), and a rapidly growing literature on inferring natural selection from such time series (Bollback et al 2008;Illingworth and Mustonen 2011;Illingworth et al 2012;Malaspinas et al 2012;Mathieson and McVean 2013). However, even the simplest case-the dynamics of two alternative alleles at a single genetic locus independent of all other loci-presents a number of statistical challenges that have not been resolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, it seems that dynamic data should provide researchers with more power to detect and quantify selective forces while avoiding the assumptions of stationarity that are required for many inference techniques based on static samples (Sawyer and Hartl 1992;Boyko et al 2008;Desai and Plotkin 2008). Nonetheless, the behavior and power of inference techniques based on time series data have not been thoroughly investigated.There is a well-developed literature on inferring population sizes from genetic time-series data, assuming neutrality (Pollak 1983;Waples 1989;Williamson and Slatkin 1999;Wang 2001), and a rapidly growing literature on inferring natural selection from such time series (Bollback et al 2008;Illingworth and Mustonen 2011;Illingworth et al 2012;Malaspinas et al 2012;Mathieson and McVean 2013). However, even the simplest case-the dynamics of two alternative alleles at a single genetic locus independent of all other loci-presents a number of statistical challenges that have not been resolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a well-developed literature on inferring population sizes from genetic time-series data, assuming neutrality (Pollak 1983;Waples 1989;Williamson and Slatkin 1999;Wang 2001), and a rapidly growing literature on inferring natural selection from such time series (Bollback et al 2008;Illingworth and Mustonen 2011;Illingworth et al 2012;Malaspinas et al 2012;Mathieson and McVean 2013). However, even the simplest case-the dynamics of two alternative alleles at a single genetic locus independent of all other loci-presents a number of statistical challenges that have not been resolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutation in GYS1 might thus have undergone selection in the past, but the relaxed constraints prevailing today, including a limited population size, might ultimately lead to the disappearance of this allele in this breed (McCoy et al 2014). It is noteworthy that in such cases of fluctuating selection, ancient DNA can help recover full time series of allele frequencies (Ludwig et al 2015) and better characterize the dynamics of underlying selective regimes (Malaspinas et al 2012;Schraiber et al 2016).…”
Section: Engendering Modern Breedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They chose to use a uniform prior on the initial frequency; however, in truth the initial allele frequency is dictated by the fact that the allele at some point arose as a new mutation. Using this information, Malaspinas et al (2012) developed a method that also infers allele age. They also extended the selection model of Bollback et al (2008) (2014) is ideally suited to experimental evolution studies because they work in a strong selection, weak drift limit that is common in evolving microbial populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key way that these methods differ from each other is in how they compute the probability of the underlying allele frequency changes. For instance, Malaspinas et al (2012) approximated the diffusion with a birth-death type Markov chain, while SteinrĂźcken et al (2014) approximate the likelihood analytically, using a spectral representation of the diffusion discovered by Song and SteinrĂźcken (2012). These different computational strategies are necessary because of the inherent difficulty in solving the Wright-Fisher partial differential equation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%