2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating between- and within-individual variation in cortisol levels using multilevel models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
254
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
254
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity, pre-stress values were compared with maximal (peak) values during the task and post-task values for each individual for heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (Kaye et al, 2004;Hruschka, Kohrt, & Worthman, 2005;Wetherell et al, 2006) and were assessed across the three workload intensities using two way (low, medium, high intensity X pre, peak, post value) repeated measures analysis of variance. Pre-post differences in mood parameters were assessed across the three workload intensities using two-way (low, medium and high intensity X pre-post stress) repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Treatment Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To account for individual differences in cardiovascular reactivity, pre-stress values were compared with maximal (peak) values during the task and post-task values for each individual for heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (Kaye et al, 2004;Hruschka, Kohrt, & Worthman, 2005;Wetherell et al, 2006) and were assessed across the three workload intensities using two way (low, medium, high intensity X pre, peak, post value) repeated measures analysis of variance. Pre-post differences in mood parameters were assessed across the three workload intensities using two-way (low, medium and high intensity X pre-post stress) repeated measures analysis of variance.…”
Section: Treatment Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the relatively small sample size in the current study, a single measure of reactivity for each of the cardiovascular variables was, therefore, calculated. Individual peak responses are also considered appropriate as they allow for the interpretation of within-individual variation in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 stress responding (Hruschka et al, 2005). This is especially important given the capacity for individual differences in responding to the multitasking framework, where demand may not be consistent throughout a session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytically, these measures represent interrelated but distinct aspects of the psychobiology of stress and the stress response: i.e., the HPA axis and the sympathetic nervous system (64)(65)(66)88). Salivary analytes such as these are increasingly used to assess psychosomatic stress in non-WEIRD contexts, thus providing both methods and interpretive frameworks for our own research (9,16,69,(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95). Alongside the two physiological analytes, we also elicited responses from Sahariya to the Bradford Somatic Index (BSI) (96), a psychiatric scale validated to capture mental health disorders among South Asian populations.…”
Section: Research Hypotheses and Analytical Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Height for age (HAZ) represents cumulative growth Salivary cortisol. Participants contributed morning samples over 7-10 consecutive days to derive a representative estimate of morning HPA activity (Hruschka et al, 2005), having been habituated to saliva collection by a previous week-long round of daily collection not considered in the present analysis. They were met at prespecified locations, and asked to rinse their mouth with water, wait 15 min for equilibration, and collect unstimulated 2.5 ml saliva into calibrated Sterilin vials pretreated with sodium azide (one drop 2% aqueous solution [wt/ vol], dried).…”
Section: Biomarkers and Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%