2010
DOI: 10.3758/brm.42.3.871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating confidence intervals for eigenvalues in exploratory factor analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CIs of eigenvalues were estimated using the mathematical method provided in Larsen and Warne (2010). The means of the eigenvalues and the means of the corresponding 95 % CIs across 2,000 data sets were computed for each condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CIs of eigenvalues were estimated using the mathematical method provided in Larsen and Warne (2010). The means of the eigenvalues and the means of the corresponding 95 % CIs across 2,000 data sets were computed for each condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater percentage, 78 %, of empirical EFA studies using nonstatistical extraction methods was found in psychological research (Henson & Roberts, 2006). For nonstatistical extraction methods, several criteria are used to help make the decision pertaining to the number of factors to retain, including the eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule (eigenvalue >1; Kaiser, 1960), confidence intervals for eigenvalues (Larsen & Warne, 2010), the scree test (Cattell, 1966), parallel analysis (Horn, 1965), minimum average partial correlations (Velicer, 1976), percentages of the total variance explained, extracted communality, residual matrices, and substantive interpretation of the factor structure; some criteria are used more often than others. A review of empirical EFA studies revealed that the criterion of eigenvalue >1 was overly relied on, with about 19 % of EFA studies in psychological research using an eigenvalue >1 as the sole criterion (Fabrigar, Wegener, MacCallum, & Strahan, 1999), and similar percentages have been reported in reviews of organizational research, with 22 % in 1986 (Ford, MacCallum, & Tait, 1986) and 18 % in 2003 (Conway & Huffcutt, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (Larsen & Warne ) was carried out using the obtained genetic correlation matrix with a varimax rotation strategy, in order to find the most suitable trait combination to create the genetic indices. The proposed indices were defined according to the traditional criteria of selection in the Lidia cattle breed: aggressiveness (fighting ability or wildness), strength (the ability to attack with strength using the whole body) and mobility (the animal is in continuous movement pacing from one place to another) (Pelayo et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFA procedure aims at retaining as few factors as possible while explaining most of the variation in the data. The scree plot (31) and the modified eigenvaluegreater-than-one rule (32) were used to properly identify the number of factors in this specific section of the questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach alpha coefficients with data from the first completion of the questionnaire.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%