“…A greater percentage, 78 %, of empirical EFA studies using nonstatistical extraction methods was found in psychological research (Henson & Roberts, 2006). For nonstatistical extraction methods, several criteria are used to help make the decision pertaining to the number of factors to retain, including the eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule (eigenvalue >1; Kaiser, 1960), confidence intervals for eigenvalues (Larsen & Warne, 2010), the scree test (Cattell, 1966), parallel analysis (Horn, 1965), minimum average partial correlations (Velicer, 1976), percentages of the total variance explained, extracted communality, residual matrices, and substantive interpretation of the factor structure; some criteria are used more often than others. A review of empirical EFA studies revealed that the criterion of eigenvalue >1 was overly relied on, with about 19 % of EFA studies in psychological research using an eigenvalue >1 as the sole criterion (Fabrigar, Wegener, MacCallum, & Strahan, 1999), and similar percentages have been reported in reviews of organizational research, with 22 % in 1986 (Ford, MacCallum, & Tait, 1986) and 18 % in 2003 (Conway & Huffcutt, 2003).…”