2018
DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1417745
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating defoliation of Scots pine stands using machine learning methods and vegetation indices of Sentinel-2

Abstract: In the presented study, the Sentinel-2 vegetation indices (VIs) were evaluated in context of estimating defoliation of Scots pine stands in western Poland. Regression and classification models were built based on reference data from 50 field plots and Sentinel-2 satellite images from three acquisition dates. Three machine-learning (ML) methods were tested: k-nearest neighbors (kNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM). Regression models predicted stands defoliation with moderate accuracy. R 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Five indices were extracted: the Chl red edge index (CHL‐RED‐EDGE) and the MERIS terrestrial Chl index (MTCI) that indirectly correlate with Chl degradation; the plant senescence reflectance index (PSRI), indirectly correlated with canopy coloration; and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), indirectly correlated with leaf fall. The remote sensing indices, with B02, B04, B05, B06 and B08 representing the five used Sentinel‐2 bands, were calculated using the following formulas (Hawryło et al ., ):NDVI=B08-B04B08+B04EVI=2.5×B08-B04B08+6B04-7.5B02+1CHL-RED-EDGE=B05B08MTCI=B06-B05B05-B04PSRI=B04-B02B06…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five indices were extracted: the Chl red edge index (CHL‐RED‐EDGE) and the MERIS terrestrial Chl index (MTCI) that indirectly correlate with Chl degradation; the plant senescence reflectance index (PSRI), indirectly correlated with canopy coloration; and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), indirectly correlated with leaf fall. The remote sensing indices, with B02, B04, B05, B06 and B08 representing the five used Sentinel‐2 bands, were calculated using the following formulas (Hawryło et al ., ):NDVI=B08-B04B08+B04EVI=2.5×B08-B04B08+6B04-7.5B02+1CHL-RED-EDGE=B05B08MTCI=B06-B05B05-B04PSRI=B04-B02B06…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using a Chl content meter) or, when studying forest stands, remote sensing approaches, which can avoid the leaf sampling phase and can make use of several established remote sensing indices of seasonal Chl trends (Richardson et al, 2002;Dash & Curran, 2010). However, no suited direct remote sensing index currently exists for leaf N (Homolov a et al, 2013;Hawryło et al, 2018). Following the third approach, the onset of leaf senescence can be derived from the loss of canopy greenness, a variable that considers primarily coloration but also leaf loss of the colored leaves (Vitasse et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM is a supervised non-parametric classifier based on statistical learning theory [47,48] and on the kernel method that has been introduced recently for the application of image classification [49]. SVM classifiers have demonstrated their efficacy in several remote sensing applications in forest ecosystems [49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Implementation Of Support Vector Machine (Svm) and Random Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final forest health indicator was evaluated with RMSE of 1.674 and R-square of 0.47. From recent articles a study on defoliation of pine stands was presented in [50] where authors evaluated possibility of Sentinel 2 vegetation indices for assessment of this defoliation with several machine learning algorithms (kNN, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines) obtaining the accuracy of 12.2%, 11.9%, and 11.6% respectively with R-square values of 0.53, 0.57, 0.57.…”
Section: Assessing Forest Health and Physiology Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%