2020
DOI: 10.1080/2150704x.2020.1820613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating diameter at breast height using personal laser scanning data based on stem surface nodes in polar coordinates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poorly aligned point cloud segments and mixed point noise data in MLS affect DBH extraction accuracy. There have been some methods such as ANPDA [28] and SSN [31] aiming to minimize this effect, but there is still a lack of methods based on the conventional automatic DBH extraction framework without additional processing operations. Drawing on the idea of leveraging point cloud intensity information, as presented in [30], this study constructs a DBH estimation method without additional processing operations based on a conventional automatic DBH extraction framework, which effectively reduces the influence of poorly aligned point cloud segments and mixed point noise data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poorly aligned point cloud segments and mixed point noise data in MLS affect DBH extraction accuracy. There have been some methods such as ANPDA [28] and SSN [31] aiming to minimize this effect, but there is still a lack of methods based on the conventional automatic DBH extraction framework without additional processing operations. Drawing on the idea of leveraging point cloud intensity information, as presented in [30], this study constructs a DBH estimation method without additional processing operations based on a conventional automatic DBH extraction framework, which effectively reduces the influence of poorly aligned point cloud segments and mixed point noise data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have pointed out that poorly aligned point cloud segments and mixed point noise data in MLS affect the accuracy of DBH extraction [28][29][30] and that general point cloud preprocessing algorithms have difficulty in removing this type of low-quality point. Annular neighboring points distribution analysis (ANPDA) [28] and stem surface node (SSN) [31] have been proposed as preprocessing methods for DBH extraction, aiming to minimize the effect of poorly aligned point clouds on the DBH extraction. ANPDA identifies outliers by iteratively removing the outermost points and analyzing the distribution of neighboring points, using relative entropy to determine the termination criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellipse fitting methods include adaptive ellipse fitting [8] and robust least squares fitting [9]. Circle fitting methods encompass image detection-based methods [10][11][12][13] (such as Hough transform, camera point clouds, wireframe models, and region segmentation), as well as algebraic and geometric methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22](such as the least squares quadratic screening method, minimum variance iterative algorithm, and ringneighbor point method). Additionally, model-based methods include the tree height-DBH model and conical geometric model [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%