2015
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-12-7469-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating evapotranspiration with thermal UAV data and two source energy balance models

Abstract: Abstract. Estimating evapotranspiration is important when managing water resources and cultivating crops. Evapotranspiration can be estimated using land surface heat flux models and remotely sensed land surface temperatures (LST) which recently have become obtainable in very high resolution using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Very high resolution LST can give insight into e.g. distributed crop conditions within cultivated fields. In this study evapotranspiration is estimated using LST retrieved with a UAV a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the influence of the “human factor,” the same location (pixel coordinates) of georeferenced high contrast markers in the aerial 2D images was used across the four different software. The citations given alongside indicate other literature examples that have utilized these software in ecology research: 3DFlow Zephyr Aerial (little evidence of use in ecology, though widely used in urban environments, e.g., Vassena & Clerici, ; Peel, Luo, Cohn, & Fuentes, ; Azzola, Cardaci, Mirabella Roberti, & Nannei, ). Agisoft Photoscan (Cunliffe et al, ; Dandois et al, ; Hoffmann et al, ; Javernick, Brasington, & Caruso, ; Lucieer, Turner, King, & Robinson, ; Obanawa & Hayakawa, ). Pix4D (Magtalas, Aves, & Blanco, ; Ouédraogo, Degré, Debouche, & Lisein, ; Raeva, Filipova, & Filipov, ). MICMAC (Forsmoo et al, ; Lisein, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, Bonnet, & Lejeune, ; Ouédraogo et al, ; Tournadre, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, & Faure, ; Tournadre, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, & Faure, ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the influence of the “human factor,” the same location (pixel coordinates) of georeferenced high contrast markers in the aerial 2D images was used across the four different software. The citations given alongside indicate other literature examples that have utilized these software in ecology research: 3DFlow Zephyr Aerial (little evidence of use in ecology, though widely used in urban environments, e.g., Vassena & Clerici, ; Peel, Luo, Cohn, & Fuentes, ; Azzola, Cardaci, Mirabella Roberti, & Nannei, ). Agisoft Photoscan (Cunliffe et al, ; Dandois et al, ; Hoffmann et al, ; Javernick, Brasington, & Caruso, ; Lucieer, Turner, King, & Robinson, ; Obanawa & Hayakawa, ). Pix4D (Magtalas, Aves, & Blanco, ; Ouédraogo, Degré, Debouche, & Lisein, ; Raeva, Filipova, & Filipov, ). MICMAC (Forsmoo et al, ; Lisein, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, Bonnet, & Lejeune, ; Ouédraogo et al, ; Tournadre, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, & Faure, ; Tournadre, Pierrot‐Deseilligny, & Faure, ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these UAS, higher spatial and temporal data resolution can be achieved, which makes possible precision agriculture applications to the submeter resolution per pixel. This allows research and practical applications applied to growth and vigor dynamic assessment, plant water status sensing for irrigation scheduling applications, and evapotranspiration modelling, among others [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Remote Sensing Platform Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several image analysis techniques and algorithms have been developed to go around these issues, which will be described later. Even though there are many considerations as described before, the construction of simple VI algorithm could many times render simple and effective tools to measure vegetation status on the surface of the Earth [6].…”
Section: Remote Sensing and Vegetation Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If more forest researchers followed a single model in quantifying forest carbon stock, results across studies could be more easily compared and these results could more simply be used to inform global climate models. This calls for forest ecologists to be transparent with the choices they make in collecting and processing the data so that benchmark comparisons can be made between methods (Capolupo et al 2015, Hoffmann et al 2015, Wallace et al 2016, Yue, et al 2018a, Yue et al 2018b). There needs to be a conversation comparing and refining various forest trait estimation methods from UAS data to amplify their existing utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%