Estimating excess 1- year mortality from COVID-19 according to underlying conditions and age in England: a rapid analysis using NHS health records in 3.8 million adults

Abstract

Background:The medical, health service, societal and economic impact of the COVID-19 emergency has unknown effects on overall population mortality. Previous models of population mortality are based on death over days among infected people, nearly all of whom (to date at least) have underlying conditions. Models have not incorporated information on high risk conditions or their longer term background (pre-COVID-19) mortality. We estimated the excess number of deaths over 1 year under different COVID-19 incidence rates and differing mortality impacts. Methods:Using population based linked primary and secondary care electronic health records in England (HDR UK -CALIBER), we report the prevalence of underlying conditions defined by UK Public Health England COVID-19 guidelines (16 March 2020) in 3,862,012 individuals aged ≥30 years from 1997-2017. We used previously validated phenotypes, openly available (https://caliberresearch.org/portal), for each condition using ICD-10 diagnosis, Read, procedure and medication codes. We estimated the 1-year mortality in each condition, and developed simple models of excess COVID-19-related deaths assuming relative risk (RR) of the impact of the emergency (compared to background mortality) of 1.2, 1.5 and 2.0. Rapid communication 22/3/20202 Findings: 20.0% of the population are at risk according to current PHE guidelines, of which; 13.7% were age>70 years and 6.3% aged ≤70 years with ≥1 underlying condition (cardiovascular disease (2.3%), diabetes (2.2%), steroid therapy (1.9%), severe obesity (0.9%), chronic kidney disease (0.6%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD (0.5%). Multimorbidity (co-occurrence of ≥2 conditions in an individual) was common (10.1%). The 1-year mortality in the at-risk population was 4.46%, and age and underlying conditions combine to influence background risk, varying markedly across conditions (5.9% in age>70 years, 8.6% for COPD and 13.1% in those with ≥3 or more conditions). In a suppression scenario (at SARS CoV2 rates of 0.001% of the UK population), there would be minimal excess deaths (3 and 7 excess deaths at relative risk, RR, 1.5 and 2.0 respectively).At SARS CoV2 rates of 10% of the UK population (mitigation) the model estimates the numbers of excess deaths as: 13791, 34479 and 68957 (at RR 1.2, 1.5 and 2.0 respectively).At SARS CoV2 rates of 80% in the UK population ("do-nothing"), the model estimates the number of excess deaths as 110332, 275,830 and 551,659 (at RR 1.2, 1.5 and 2.0) respectively. Interpretation:We provide the public, researchers and policy makers a simple model to estimate the excess mortality over 1 year from COVID-19, based on underlying conditions at different ages. If the relative mortality impact of COVID-19 were to be about 20% (similar magnitude as the established winter vs summer mortality excess), then the excess deaths would be 0 when 1 in 100 000 (suppression), 13791 when 1 in 10 (mitigation) and 110332 when 8 in 10 are infected ("do nothing") scenario. However, the relative impact of COVID-19 is unknown....

COVID-19 – exploring the implications of long-term condition type and extent of multimorbidity on years of life lost: a modelling study

“…This may give a distorting picture of the mortality burden, however, as it does not consider how long someone who died from COVID-19 might otherwise have been expected to live. As people dying from COVID-19 are predominantly older and have pre-existing LTCs [5][6][7] , some have speculated that many of these people would have soon died of other causes and that life expectancy may therefore not being greatly impacted 8,9 . While multimorbidity, the presence of multiple LTCs, is known to be associated with increased mortality 10 , people with multimorbidity nonetheless can be expected to live for many years 11 .…”

How many are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease? Rapid global, regional and national estimates for 2020

“…A large proportion of the additional health care burden of COVID-19 epidemics is likely to result from infection of those with underlying conditions. Identifying at-risk populations is important not only for making projections of the likely health burden in countries, 9,10 but also for the design of effective strategies that aim to reduce the risk of transmission to people in target groups. This is sometimes termed shielding, defined as "a measure to protect extremely vulnerable people by minimising interaction between those who are extremely vulnerable and others."…”

Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for COVID-19: results from UK Biobank

“…Predictors of disease severity include older age, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease, COPD, and previous cardiovascular disease [4][5][6][7] . In addition it is becoming clear that other risk factors might include obesity and low physical fitness 8,9 .…”