2019
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1662166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating fractional green vegetation cover of Mongolian grasslands using digital camera images and MODIS satellite vegetation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LiDAR point data were mainly classified as vegetation, ground and other noise by the triangulated irregular network (TIN) filtering method [38], which is embedded in TerraScan (Terrasolid Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) for module classification in the Terrasolid software package to create a digital terrain model (DTM) and a digital surface model (DSM) from the LiDAR data. Classification points were assessed to ensure that most LiDAR points were correctly classified.…”
Section: Lidar Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR point data were mainly classified as vegetation, ground and other noise by the triangulated irregular network (TIN) filtering method [38], which is embedded in TerraScan (Terrasolid Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) for module classification in the Terrasolid software package to create a digital terrain model (DTM) and a digital surface model (DSM) from the LiDAR data. Classification points were assessed to ensure that most LiDAR points were correctly classified.…”
Section: Lidar Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also less influenced by the specific differences in illumination and shade within and between images [40,41]. The use of different colour spaces is well-established for estimating fractional crop cover and for image segmentation and classification (e.g., [38,[42][43][44][45][46][47], but has also been applied for disease detection [48] and for assessing nitrogen content of leaves and canopies [39,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last decades have seen the development of methods to estimate crop FVC based on remote-sensing images from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), aerial, or satellite platforms [ 5 , 29 33 ]. These methods can be divided into five categories: (i) physical model methods, (ii) semi-empirical methods, (iii) empirical methods, (iv) crop growth methods, and (v) hybrid methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of the parameters required by these models may not be readily available, which limits the application of the models. Semi-empirical methods are often simplified versions of physical models and include the soil line method [ 39 ], the pixel dichotomy model (PDM) [ 40 , 41 ], and the Baret model [ 29 , 32 ]. The PDM hypothesizes that pixels contain mixed information from soils and crops [SI total = (1 − FVC) × SI soil + FVC × SI vegetation ], which allows FVC to be calculated [FVC = (SI total − SI soil )/(SI vegetation − SI soil )] [ 42 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%