2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration from water table fluctuations under three vegetation covers in a coastal sandy aquifer of subtropical Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the recharge model indicate that in nontrenched hillslopes, 79.6% of precipitation infiltrates into the ground and 48.6% becomes groundwater recharge (reaches the water table), whereas for trenched hillslopes, 83.3% of precipitation becomes infiltration and 52.1% becomes recharge. This value is fairly high compared to that of some studies (Jódar et al, ) but is within range of the value of other studies that have estimated recharge relative to precipitation in alpine catchments (Crosbie, Jolly, Leaney, & Petheram, ; Voeckler, Allen, & Alila, ; Fan, Oestergaard, Guyot, & Lockington, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The results of the recharge model indicate that in nontrenched hillslopes, 79.6% of precipitation infiltrates into the ground and 48.6% becomes groundwater recharge (reaches the water table), whereas for trenched hillslopes, 83.3% of precipitation becomes infiltration and 52.1% becomes recharge. This value is fairly high compared to that of some studies (Jódar et al, ) but is within range of the value of other studies that have estimated recharge relative to precipitation in alpine catchments (Crosbie, Jolly, Leaney, & Petheram, ; Voeckler, Allen, & Alila, ; Fan, Oestergaard, Guyot, & Lockington, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Features such as rainfall regimes, soil types, geological conditions, water table depths and alternative land uses affect groundwater balance components and can vary significantly between locations. While some researchers report a reduction in groundwater recharge because of afforestation (Fan et al , ), others report the opposite response (Krishnaswamy et al , ) and others project a mixed response that varies over time (Wyatt et al , ). In this study, groundwater exchanges flows (recharge and discharge) calculated from the afforested DT basin were similar to those found for the pastured LC basin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, such affects appear to fluctuate depending on climatic patterns and tree species present. In regards to groundwater recharge, some researchers have found a decreasing pattern (Finch, ; Le Maitre et al , ; Allen and Chapman, ; Calder, ; Birkinshaw et al , ; Fan et al , ). However, García Préchac et al () found less soil water retention at 10 kPa (field capacity) in different Uruguayan experimental plots of Eucalyptus plantations compared to retention levels found for the same soils covered by natural pastures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c) were still around 1 kPa in December, indicating that the water content was above the field capacity. A similar extinction coefficient of 1.0 m below the soil surface was also suggested for pine trees and native vegetation on Bribie Island (Harbison & Cox 1998;Fan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Fig3supporting
confidence: 60%