2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating hydraulic conductivities of the soil aggregates and their clay-organic coatings using numerical inversion of capillary rise data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, larger WDPT values measured at surfaces with coatings than those at uncoated surface were also associated with generally lower hydraulic conductivity of coatings (consisted of fine grained material) in comparison to hydraulic conductivity of aggregate interiors. Considerable differences between the hydraulic conductivities of aggregate coating and interiors were observed for soil aggregates taken from the same soil horizon by Fér and Kodešová (2012) and Kodešová et al (2012). Results of our measurements on dry soil samples showed a slightly different relationship between WDPT and PWI, than those results of Leue et al (2015), who observed a non-linear relationship between PWI and WDPT (R = 0.5, p < 0.001) for different types of preferential flow path surfaces.…”
Section: Wdpt Explained By Pwi Of Som At Aggregate Surfacescontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, larger WDPT values measured at surfaces with coatings than those at uncoated surface were also associated with generally lower hydraulic conductivity of coatings (consisted of fine grained material) in comparison to hydraulic conductivity of aggregate interiors. Considerable differences between the hydraulic conductivities of aggregate coating and interiors were observed for soil aggregates taken from the same soil horizon by Fér and Kodešová (2012) and Kodešová et al (2012). Results of our measurements on dry soil samples showed a slightly different relationship between WDPT and PWI, than those results of Leue et al (2015), who observed a non-linear relationship between PWI and WDPT (R = 0.5, p < 0.001) for different types of preferential flow path surfaces.…”
Section: Wdpt Explained By Pwi Of Som At Aggregate Surfacescontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Clay-organic coatings often cover aggregates and biopores in the clay-illuviation Bt-horizons of Luvisols (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2014). These coatings considerably restrict interactions between pores inside and outside of the aggregates (e.g., Fér and Kodešová, 2012;Gerke and Köhne, 2002;. Earthworm burrow walls can also be coated by the earthworm casts, which often have different soil chemical and physical properties than the bulk soil (Jouquet et al, 2008;Lipiec et al, 2015;Schrader et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimized saturated hydraulic conductivities of aggregate coatings were found to be one to two order of magnitude lower than the saturated hydraulic conductivities of the aggregates (Fér and Kodešová, 2012). Bartoli and Dousset (2011) found that the greater the apparent contact angle value, the smaller the water sorptivity value and the greater the proportion of water-stable aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%