2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0530-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating ionospheric currents by inversion from ground-based geomagnetic data and calculating geoelectric fields for studies of geomagnetically induced currents

Abstract: This research focuses on the inversion of geomagnetic variation field measurements to obtain the source currents in the ionosphere and magnetosphere, and to determine the geoelectric fields at the Earth's surface. During geomagnetic storms, the geoelectric fields create geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) in power networks. These GIC may disturb the operation of power systems, cause damage to power transformers, and even result in power blackouts. In this model, line currents running east-west along given l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two equally valid formulations: The integral way is the calculation of the E field from the given current system and the surface impedance via the surface reflection coefficient R ( ν , ω ), without recourse to measured B fields beforehand. The E field Fourier integral [ De Villiers et al ., ] is Ey(),xω=iωμ0J()ω2πtruetrue∫0[]R(),νω1νprefix−1eprefix−νhnormalcos()νxdν. For R(),νω=iωμ0νZ()ωiωμ0+νZ()ω, the field calculations give the same results in the integral method at the position ( x = 0 km) of the current system, as those computed from the direct method. The surface impedance Z ( ω ) is embedded in the reflection coefficient and computed from ground profiles.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two equally valid formulations: The integral way is the calculation of the E field from the given current system and the surface impedance via the surface reflection coefficient R ( ν , ω ), without recourse to measured B fields beforehand. The E field Fourier integral [ De Villiers et al ., ] is Ey(),xω=iωμ0J()ω2πtruetrue∫0[]R(),νω1νprefix−1eprefix−νhnormalcos()νxdν. For R(),νω=iωμ0νZ()ωiωμ0+νZ()ω, the field calculations give the same results in the integral method at the position ( x = 0 km) of the current system, as those computed from the direct method. The surface impedance Z ( ω ) is embedded in the reflection coefficient and computed from ground profiles.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral way is the calculation of the E field from the given current system and the surface impedance via the surface reflection coefficient R(ν, ω), without recourse to measured B fields beforehand. The E field Fourier integral [De Villiers et al, 2016] is…”
Section: E Field Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This comprehensive approach, however, makes a rather simplified assumption on the electrical conductivity structure of the Ethiopian lithosphere. A single 1D conductivity model is used for Ethiopia based on De Villiers et al (2016), which is, in turn, loosely adopted from the local profile at Addis Ababa out of the Alekseev et al (2015) compilation at depths above 100 km and a global profile Civet et al (2015) constrained by satellite data below 100 km. Notwithstanding the consideration that a 1D profile may not be an appropriate electrical conductivity model for all of Ethiopia, another concern might stem from the fact that the electrical resistivity of the upper crust (0.1-8 km depths) is set to 2e5 Ohm•m, a number substantially higher than is reasonable for the East African Rift.…”
Section: Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each panel, the green stars identify the geographic location of the geomagnetic observatories used for this analysis. Despite previous investigations, in which sophisticated methods have been deployed to evaluate the geoelectric field (and hence GIC) over large regions (e.g., De Villiers J. S. et al, ; Püte et al, , and references therein), in the following we show maps evaluated through a simple spherical harmonics interpolation of E GIC as estimated by MA.I.GIC model from geomagnetic observations at each of the 74 ground stations. It is worth highlight that the blue region identified inside the Pacific (a and b) and Atlantic (c) Oceans, corresponding to low geoelectric field values, is an artifact generated by the absence of ground geomagnetic observatories used in this analysis.…”
Section: Magnetospheric and Ionospheric Contribution To Gicmentioning
confidence: 99%