2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1707.01143
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Large Precision Matrices via Modified Cholesky Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee and Lee [71] considered a class of bandable precision matrices in the highdimensional setup, using a modified Cholesky decomposition (MCD) approach Ω = (I p − A) T D −1 (I p − A), where D is a diagonal matrix, and A is lower-triangular with zero diagonal entries. This results in the k-banded Cholesky prior with nonzero entries of A getting the improper uniform prior and the diagonal entries a truncated polynomial prior.…”
Section: Banding and Other Special Sparsity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee and Lee [71] considered a class of bandable precision matrices in the highdimensional setup, using a modified Cholesky decomposition (MCD) approach Ω = (I p − A) T D −1 (I p − A), where D is a diagonal matrix, and A is lower-triangular with zero diagonal entries. This results in the k-banded Cholesky prior with nonzero entries of A getting the improper uniform prior and the diagonal entries a truncated polynomial prior.…”
Section: Banding and Other Special Sparsity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we have bandwidth selection consistency (Theorem 3.1), we suggest using the posterior mode to estimate the true bandwidth k 0 . We chose the bandwidth test of An et al (2014) as a frequentist competitor and the bandwidth selection procedures of Banerjee and Ghosal (2014) and Lee and Lee (2017) as Bayesian competitors. Significance levels for bandwidth tests in An et al (2014) were varied α = 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, but only the result with α = 0.01 are reported since they gave similar results.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Bandwidth Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significance levels for bandwidth tests in An et al (2014) were varied α = 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, but only the result with α = 0.01 are reported since they gave similar results. For Banerjee and Ghosal (2014) and Lee and Lee (2017), we used the prior π(k) ∝ exp(−k 4 ) as they suggested. Note that these Bayesian procedures do not guarantee the bandwidth selection consistency.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Bandwidth Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations