2002
DOI: 10.1080/01431160110114529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating leaf nitrogen concentration in ryegrass ( Lolium spp.) pasture using the chlorophyll red-edge: Theoretical modelling and experimental observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
92
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, all possible two-wavelength combinations of hyperspectral indices throughout the entire spectral range of 350-1800 nm were considered in matrix form. Based on the R 2 and RMSE values and the absorption principle, we found that the wavelengths selected by the CR and VI methods were 690/695, 709/710, 700/705, 713/727, 1200, and 1335/1340 nm, which are predominantly located in the red-edge and near-infrared regions, as noted in many previous studies [16,17,26,58,59]. The selected wavelengths differed for the CR and VIs methods, perhaps because CR can be used to determine the absorbing positions of chlorophyll or carotenoids, whereas for the VI-based approach, the much more sensitive wavelength of N can be used because of the different calculation formulas for the two spectral indices.…”
Section: Wavelength Selection For the Six Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, all possible two-wavelength combinations of hyperspectral indices throughout the entire spectral range of 350-1800 nm were considered in matrix form. Based on the R 2 and RMSE values and the absorption principle, we found that the wavelengths selected by the CR and VI methods were 690/695, 709/710, 700/705, 713/727, 1200, and 1335/1340 nm, which are predominantly located in the red-edge and near-infrared regions, as noted in many previous studies [16,17,26,58,59]. The selected wavelengths differed for the CR and VIs methods, perhaps because CR can be used to determine the absorbing positions of chlorophyll or carotenoids, whereas for the VI-based approach, the much more sensitive wavelength of N can be used because of the different calculation formulas for the two spectral indices.…”
Section: Wavelength Selection For the Six Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The wavelengths of 492 and 508 nm lie in the visible range and are often strongly absorbed by plant chlorophyll and carotenoids in green plants [42]. The wavelengths of 681, 695, and 722 nm lie in the red range and are sensitive indicators of the LNC and chlorophyll [16,17,26,58,59]. The wavelengths of 960, 1264, 1339, and 1369 nm are located in the shortwave infrared range and are indicators of proteins [27].…”
Section: Wavelength Selection For the Six Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since plant chlorophyll concentration is highly correlated with nitrogen status (Hansen & Schjoerring, 2003;Haboudane et al, 2004), REP has also been used for evaluating plant nitrogen status (Lamb et al, 2002;Jongschaap & Booij, 2004). However, as most often encountered, REP is not adequate to track the variations in chlorophyll concentration due to its doublepeak feature (Clevers et al, 2004;Cho and Skidmore, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red-edge slope is of particular relevance for leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) because of its enhanced sensitivity to varied and higher chlorophyll levels while circumventing saturation problems as observed in the blue and red due to vast chlorophyll-induced absorption (Gitelson, 2012;Kooistra and Clevers, 2016). Reliance on wavelengths at the onset of the near-infrared follows from the gradual stabilization of reflectance beyond the red-edge, which settles at higher values for increased chlorophyll levels (Lamb et al, 2002). Largely similar spectral regions were structurally highlighted for N content, resulting from the inherent biochemical linkage between leaf N, chlorophyll molecules and photosynthetic capacity (Sellers et al, 1992;Weiss et al, 2001;Netto et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Relevant Wavelengths For Plant Trait Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%