2013
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.054502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating mean annual 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations from single measurements: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Abstract: Single measurements may misclassify annual exposure, which may lead to bias in research and complicate clinical decision making. Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a model for adjusting a single measurement of a serum 25(OH)D concentration to the time of year it was measured. Design: We measured serum 25(OH)D concentrations by using mass spectrometry in 6476 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis at baseline and again in a subset of 368 participants at a median of 17 mo later. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6] Our study confirms previous work that mainly found modest inverse associations between 18 whereas the seasonal variation of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D has scarcely been studied. 21 We observed seasonal variation in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D over the full range of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, including participants in the highest quartile (>172 pmol/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6] Our study confirms previous work that mainly found modest inverse associations between 18 whereas the seasonal variation of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D has scarcely been studied. 21 We observed seasonal variation in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D over the full range of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, including participants in the highest quartile (>172 pmol/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The first model was adjusted for age, sex, and a cosinor model to adjust for the time of the year of blood sampling. 18 The second model was additionally adjusted for BMI (6 categories), smoking (5 categories), education (3 categories), alcohol intake (5 categories), and parental history of hypertension (yes/no). In addition, we examined the associations by adding eGFR and 24-hour urinary albumin excretion to the final model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multivariable-adjusted model included baseline age, sex, type II diabetes, history of cardiovascular disease, current smoking, use of lipid-lowering drugs, use of BPlowering drugs, body mass index, systolic BP, day of blood sampling, total HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides, baseline eGFR, and baseline albuminuria as potential confounders. To adjust for day of blood sampling, the time variable t (day) was transformed as sine [(2p/365)3t] and cosine [(2p/365)3t], which were then fitted as two variables in multivariable-adjusted models (19). As an alternative approach to account for seasonal variation, we performed additional analyses using month-specific quartiles of 25(OH)D (20).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because vitamin D is known to be affected by seasonal variation, we also performed sensitivity analysis accounting for the effects of seasonal variation of 25(OH)D. We estimated the annual mean 25(OH)D by fitting a parametric seasonal cosinor model to the observed 25(OH)D data, which follows a sinusoidal pattern (29). A detailed description of the cosinor model is presented in Supplemental Methods 4.…”
Section: Assessment Of Clinical Outcomes and Intervening Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%