2021
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2021.1904236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Moisture Resistance of asphalt mixture containing epoxy resin using Surface Free Energy Method and Modified Lottman test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superior moisture resistance for EAM than conventional asphalt mixture has generally been reported [91,94,148], probably due to the strong adhesion between EA and aggregates [151]. For mixtures with limestone aggregates, the enhanced moisture resistance was attributed to the increased adhesion between bitumen and aggregates while it was attributed to improved adhesion between aggregates and bitumen as well as the increased wetting of bitumen on aggregates surfaces for mixtures with siliceous aggregates [160]. Moisture…”
Section: Water Damagementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Superior moisture resistance for EAM than conventional asphalt mixture has generally been reported [91,94,148], probably due to the strong adhesion between EA and aggregates [151]. For mixtures with limestone aggregates, the enhanced moisture resistance was attributed to the increased adhesion between bitumen and aggregates while it was attributed to improved adhesion between aggregates and bitumen as well as the increased wetting of bitumen on aggregates surfaces for mixtures with siliceous aggregates [160]. Moisture…”
Section: Water Damagementioning
confidence: 91%
“…It was found that the contact angle between EA and water was higher than 90° [ 145], indicating its hydrophobic nature; the contact angle was found to increase with the increase of ER content and curing time [112,113]. In addition, the surface energy was also found to increase with the increase of ER content [113,160] and curing time up to 120 min [112].…”
Section: Water Damagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The excellent rutting performance of EAM prevents rapid failures due to moisture because of the high bonding between the aggregate and EAM. Furthermore, moisture sensitivity of EAM increases due to the binder and aggregates adhesion as well as increasing the wettability of the aggregate particles surface with binder (Bahmani et al 2021). As discussed earlier, the cured samples should be tested because EAMs without sufficient curing show misleading results.…”
Section: Ruttingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of laboratory tests have been developed over the years to determine the moisture susceptibility of bituminous compounds. They include the modified Lottman test, Tunnicliff and Root method, Hamburg wheel tracking, asphalt pavement analyzer, saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS), Marshall immersion test, resilient modulus test, and immersion-compression test [11][12][13][14]. Nevertheless, these approaches are not able to examine fundamental features of materials to predict adhesion and wetting ability of each bitumen-aggregate composition [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%