2020
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating retention in HIV care accounting for clinic transfers using electronic medical records: evidence from a large antiretroviral treatment programme in the Western Cape, South Africa

Abstract: Background Estimates of retention in antiretroviral treatment (ART) programmes may be biased if patients who transfer to healthcare clinics are misclassified as lost to follow‐up (LTFU) at their original clinic. In a large cohort, we estimated retention in care accounting for patient transfers using medical records. Methods Using linked electronic medical records, we followed adults living with HIV (PLWH) in Cape Town, South Africa from ART initiation (2012‐2016) through database closure at 36 months or 30 Jun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our estimates of retention are consistent with previously published literature on retention in ART programs in South Africa’ s Western Cape during PEPFAR (74.2%; 95% CI: 73.2%–75.2%) (30) and post-PEFAR 54.3% (95% CI:52.4%-56.1%) at 36 months follow up that used individual patient level data in their analysis (31). Third, we could have unmeasured confounding due to the inability to control for potential confounders due to missing information at the facility level (i.e., transfers, employee turnover rate).…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, our estimates of retention are consistent with previously published literature on retention in ART programs in South Africa’ s Western Cape during PEPFAR (74.2%; 95% CI: 73.2%–75.2%) (30) and post-PEFAR 54.3% (95% CI:52.4%-56.1%) at 36 months follow up that used individual patient level data in their analysis (31). Third, we could have unmeasured confounding due to the inability to control for potential confounders due to missing information at the facility level (i.e., transfers, employee turnover rate).…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the findings of this study are encouraging, we conclude with caution due to limitations inherent to the observational study design. In this study, we used the routine data collection system TIER.net, and did not account for silent transfers, which may be misclassified as LTFU, leading to underestimates of retention in DMOC and on ART [58,59]. Nevertheless, we invested a significant amount of resources to verify last visits of DMOC patients by reviewing relevant registers at the clinics and the CCMDD registers.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were linked by the PHDC using a unique patient identifier number, which permits consistent identification of individuals across visits and facilities within all districts of the Province. This data linkage effort has been described elsewhere 24 25. A deterministic linkage algorithm that relies on civil identification numbers as well as text-edit-distance fuzzy comparisons was used to reliably link patients’ visits across health facilities and remove duplicate identities 24…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data linkage effort has been described elsewhere. 24 25 A deterministic linkage algorithm that relies on civil identification numbers as well as text-edit-distance fuzzy comparisons was used to reliably link patients' visits across health facilities and remove duplicate identities. 24…”
Section: Data Sources Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%