2013
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-2369-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating soil suction from electrical resistivity

Abstract: Abstract. Soil suction and resistivity strongly depend on the degree of soil saturation and, therefore, both are used for estimating water content variations. The main difference between them is that soil suction is measured using tensiometers, which give point information, while resistivity is obtained by tomography surveys, which provide distributions of resistivity values in large volumes, although with less accuracy. In this paper, we have related soil suction to electrical resistivity with the aim of obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical surveying techniques have proved to be highly useful as they supply fast, non-invasive and detailed evaluation of some physical quantities in large buried volumes to be investigated. In particular, the well-known dependence of electrical resistivity values on the soil water content suggests the geoelectrical method as one of the most suitable for studying the suction level as a function of electrical resistivity in the field [14,15]. Piegari and Di Maio [15] showed how this non-invasive method can be implemented for monitoring spatial variations of soil suction by using soil resistivity data derived from in situ electrical resistivity tomography surveys.…”
Section: Monitoring Plan and In Situ Investigation Program For The Si...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical surveying techniques have proved to be highly useful as they supply fast, non-invasive and detailed evaluation of some physical quantities in large buried volumes to be investigated. In particular, the well-known dependence of electrical resistivity values on the soil water content suggests the geoelectrical method as one of the most suitable for studying the suction level as a function of electrical resistivity in the field [14,15]. Piegari and Di Maio [15] showed how this non-invasive method can be implemented for monitoring spatial variations of soil suction by using soil resistivity data derived from in situ electrical resistivity tomography surveys.…”
Section: Monitoring Plan and In Situ Investigation Program For The Si...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The potential use of resistivity as a proxy for suction has been previously suggested (Piegari and Di Maio 2013). In the coming years, the relationship between these parameters will be investigated using preliminary PRIME and soil suction sensor data from unit 3.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a controlled AC or DC is applied to another pair of electrodes, the 2D image of the subsurface profile both in the deep and wide area of the soil layer is presented by Loke (1999), Hazreek et al (2015), and Syed and Zuhar (2010). Many researchers have identified the type of rock and soil via the resistivity and the electric potential difference in the soil layer (Palacky 1998;Syed and Zuhar 2010;Piegari and Maio 2013). Meanwhile, the values of Ļ are overlapping among the different soil types (Kaufman and Hoekstra 2001); therefore, it is difficult to differentiate each of the soil types by using only one point in the soil layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%