2018
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating soil texture from vis–NIR spectra

Abstract: Summary Vis–NIR spectroscopy is a low‐cost method for proximal soil sensing, enabling rapid analysis of soil texture as an alternative to more laborious analytical methods. In this study we used partial least squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF) models trained on vis–NIR spectra of 173 soil samples from across Germany to estimate soil sand (63–2000 µm), silt (2–63 µm) and clay (< 2 µm) contents. Models were trained with different spectral processing methods. Texture was also estimated by averaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only two plots (+L2 and +L3) were alike in their Fe concentrations at every depth. The smallest Fe concentrations below 40 cm were found in plot −L2, where the subsoil contained more silt and less clay than in the other plots (Hobley & Prater, 2019). Correspondingly, total Fe stocks varied in the subsoil, with the mean values of 1.86 × 10 5 (standard error ( SE ) 0.33 × 10 5 ) and 1.76 × 10 5 ( SE 0.38 × 10 5 ) kg ha −1 for limed and non‐limed plots (Figure 2), respectively, without significant difference between the two treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only two plots (+L2 and +L3) were alike in their Fe concentrations at every depth. The smallest Fe concentrations below 40 cm were found in plot −L2, where the subsoil contained more silt and less clay than in the other plots (Hobley & Prater, 2019). Correspondingly, total Fe stocks varied in the subsoil, with the mean values of 1.86 × 10 5 (standard error ( SE ) 0.33 × 10 5 ) and 1.76 × 10 5 ( SE 0.38 × 10 5 ) kg ha −1 for limed and non‐limed plots (Figure 2), respectively, without significant difference between the two treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Only two plots (+L2 and +L3) were alike in their Fe concentrations at every depth. The smallest Fe concentrations below 40 cm were found in plot −L2, where the subsoil contained more silt and less clay than in the other plots (Hobley & Prater, 2019).…”
Section: Iron Concentration Stock and Isotope Composition In Bulk mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…According to the FAO (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2014), the soil at this experimental site is classified as an Albic Luvisol, developed from glacial till. The soil texture is sandy to loamy sand, dominated by sand particles that comprise 65-75% of soil weight in the topsoil (0-30 cm) and 40-60% in the subsoil (30-100 cm) (Hobley & Prater, 2019). The field site is heterogeneous with regard to textural changes with soil depth from 40 to >100 cm ( Figure S1, Sümer, 2012).…”
Section: Study Site Sampling and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used to quantify physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil [3,6]. Many previous studies have successfully predicted soil texture, colour and mineral composition [7,8,9,10], chemical and biological proper-ties [11,12,13,14,15,16], soil moisture [12,17,18], and SOM [3,19,20]. A lot of absorption bands related to organic molecules are within VIS-NIR range [21], and the reflectance spectrum also carries integrative information of organic and inorganic soil components [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%