2012
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the contribution of genetic variants to difference in incidence of disease between population groups

Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genetic susceptibility variants to several complex human diseases. However, risk-genotype frequency at loci showing robust associations might differ substantially among different populations. In this paper, we present methods to assess the contribution of genetic variants to the difference in the incidence of disease between different population groups for different scenarios. We derive expressions for the contribution of a single genetic variant, multip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inconsistent findings for HBV- and HCV-related HCC suggest that whether SNPs in the MICA and DEPDC5 loci affect the susceptibility to HCC is subject to race/ethnicity-specific differences. Undoubtedly, the same variability also applies to all the other HCC-related SNPs, which could be explained by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions contributing to the inconsistent findings in different racial or ethnic groups that have been studied[95]. …”
Section: Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inconsistent findings for HBV- and HCV-related HCC suggest that whether SNPs in the MICA and DEPDC5 loci affect the susceptibility to HCC is subject to race/ethnicity-specific differences. Undoubtedly, the same variability also applies to all the other HCC-related SNPs, which could be explained by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions contributing to the inconsistent findings in different racial or ethnic groups that have been studied[95]. …”
Section: Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with general definitions of the term used in the population genetics literature [1] . In this light, although it has been shown that a greater proportion of global genetic variation can be attributed to differences among individuals within populations rather than to differences between individuals from separate populations [2][3][4][5][6] , stratification or genetic differentiation between individuals from different populations is not negligible on a global scale and has important implications for gene mapping studies, public health campaigns, and clinical studies and practices [7][8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are many phenotypes that have emerged in different populations due to different genetic variants or sets of causative variants arising in those populations (i.e. the genetic causes of these phenotypes manifest locus or allelic heterogeneity) [8] . Thus, it might be the case that two individuals, who present with the same condition but have different ancestral backgrounds, have different genetic bases for that condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Moonesinghe et al. ). Non‐replication can be attributed to an uneven distribution of alleles within subpopulations or population substructure (Falush, Stephens, and Pritchard ).…”
Section: The Uncertainty Of Race In the Post‐genomic Agementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of most relevance to human variation and GWAS is the problem of non-replication of significant associations across human groups. With non-replication, genetic variants that confer disease risk within one population do not hold the same significant risk in other populations (Huang et al 2016;Marigorta et al 2011;Moonesinghe et al 2012). Non-replication can be attributed to an uneven distribution of alleles within subpopulations or population substructure (Falush, Stephens, and Pritchard 2003).…”
Section: The Uncertainty Of Race In Thementioning
confidence: 99%