1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00397668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the grazing impact of marine micro-zooplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
1,018
1
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,112 publications
(1,053 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
19
1,018
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…All values in the data set were provided as such in the reports. Methods included the dilution technique (Landry and Hassett 1982) and grazer evacuation rates (Kiorbe and Tiselius 1987) for phytoplanktonic communities and herbivore enclosure/exclosures for the rest of communities (Valentine and Heck 1991;Heck et al 2000). Some estimates of herbivory on macroalgae, seagrasses, and mangroves were based on the number and size of herbivore bites imprinted on thalli or leaf blades (Ogden 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All values in the data set were provided as such in the reports. Methods included the dilution technique (Landry and Hassett 1982) and grazer evacuation rates (Kiorbe and Tiselius 1987) for phytoplanktonic communities and herbivore enclosure/exclosures for the rest of communities (Valentine and Heck 1991;Heck et al 2000). Some estimates of herbivory on macroalgae, seagrasses, and mangroves were based on the number and size of herbivore bites imprinted on thalli or leaf blades (Ogden 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the growth and mortality rate of microphytoplankton, dilution experiments were conducted (Landry and Hassett, 1982;Landry et al, 1995). All incubation bottles, tubes, and carboys were acid-rinsed first with 10 % HCl and then with distilled water.…”
Section: Dilution Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could calculate the slope as the grazing mortality (m) and the intercept as the intrinsic phytoplankton growth rate (µ) (Landry and Hassett, 1982;Landry et al, 1995). The novel and additional calculation here is that, for each size class, we carried out linear regression of realized phytoplankton growth rates on four dilution treatments to estimate size-specific growth rate and grazing mortality (Fig.…”
Section: Calculation Of Size-specific Growth Rate and Grazing Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este impacto es una medida de la presión de consumo que ejerce el zooplancton sobre el fitoplancton, y para su estimación es necesario conocer la abundancia del zooplancton que consume fitoplancton, la cantidad de material fitoplanctónico disponible en el ambiente que se cuantifica con base en la concentración de clorofila-a, y las tasas de ingestiones específicas (Morales et Aunque los copépodos no se alimentan exclusivamente de fitoplancton, junto con las salpas y los eufaúsidos, son considerados los organismos planctónicos que mayor impacto alimentario ejercen sobre el fitoplancton en el ambiente pelágico (Mauchline, 1998). Sin embargo, sus tasas de ingestión generalmente se relacionan con el tamaño del organismos, por lo que los trabajos de impacto alimentario en función del espectro de tamaño presenta ventajas comparativas sobre estudios a nivel de especie , toda vez que las diferentes fracciones de tamaño se alimentan de tamaños específicos de organismos fitoplanctónicos (Landry & Hassett, 1982 Tradicionalmente, se ha utilizado la fluorescencia intestinal (Mackas & Bohrer, 1976) como método indirecto para realizar la estimación de las tasas de ingestión in situ en diferentes especies de copépodos (Morales et al, 1990;Sautor et al, 2000;Tseng et al, 2008;Li et. al., 2013, Isla et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified