1998
DOI: 10.1006/jhec.1998.0237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Income Elasticity of Demand for Housing: A Comparison of Traditional and Lorenz-Concentration Curve Methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implied income elasticity of housing demand in the model is .33, which is toward the low end of estimates in the literature, e.g. Hansen et al (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The implied income elasticity of housing demand in the model is .33, which is toward the low end of estimates in the literature, e.g. Hansen et al (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Polinsky (1977) surveyed the literature and derived his own estimates using US data and concluded that an own price elasticity of -0.75 and an income elasticity of 0.75 was consistent with a large amount of the research at that time. Hansen et al (1998) obtained an income elasticity of 0.88 which, in the context of our model, does not provide substantially different results. Therefore, in our simulations we used an own price elasticity of -0.75 and an income elasticity of 0.75.…”
Section: ΄ ΅·mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Estimates of housing demand elasticities vary widely in the literature. See, for example, Glaeser et al (2008), Haurin et al (1994) and Hansen et al (1998). We require only that housing demand be strictly increasing in wealth or permanent income and strictly decreasing in price, all else equal.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%