Estimating the size of undetected cases of the COVID-19 outbreak in Europe: an upper bound estimator

Abstract

BackgroundWhile the number of detected COVID-19 infections are widely available, an understanding of the extent of undetected cases is urgently needed for an effective tackling of the pandemic. The aim of this work is to estimate the true number of COVID-19 (detected and undetected) infections in several European countries. The question being asked is: How many cases have actually occurred?MethodsWe propose an upper bound estimator under cumulative data distributions, in an open population, based on a day-wise estimator that allows for heterogeneity. The estimator is data-driven and can be easily computed from the distributions of daily cases and deaths. Uncertainty surrounding the estimates is obtained using bootstrap methods.ResultsWe focus on the ratio of the total estimated cases to the observed cases at April 17th. Differences arise at the country level, and we get estimates ranging from the 3.93 times of Norway to the 7.94 times of France. Accurate estimates are obtained, as bootstrap-based intervals are rather narrow.ConclusionsMany parametric or semi-parametric models have been developed to estimate the population size from aggregated counts leading to an approximation of the missed population and/or to the estimate of the threshold under which the number of missed people cannot fall (i.e. a lower bound). Here, we provide a methodological contribution introducing an upper bound estimator and provide reliable estimates on the dark number, i.e. how many undetected cases are going around for several European countries, where the epidemic spreads differently.

A statistical model for the dynamics of COVID‐19 infections and their case detection ratio in 2020

“…( 2020 ) and Rocchetti et al. ( 2020 ), where the latter derive an upper bound for the cumulative number in mid‐April for 10 European countries. The ratio of the upper bound and the observed number of cases ranges from around 4 (Greece) to around 8 (France).…”

Risk Predictors and Symptom Features of Long COVID Within a Broad Primary Care Patient Population Including Both Tested and Untested Patients

“…However, current data on persisting symptoms of COVID-19 has been mostly derived from cases identified via positive test results. [7][8][9][10][11][14][15][16] While the exact numbers are not known, estimates suggested that the majority of COVID-19 cases went undetected, 17,18 likely due to limited testing capacity in the early phase of the pandemic. Furthermore, many studies on the long-term symptoms of COVID-19 have focused primarily on hospitalized patients.…”

Estimating COVID-19-induced Excess Mortality in Lombardy

“…Incidence indicators based on official reporting underestimate the true number of cases since there exists a vast proportion of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients, among all infected individuals, who are not detected [5, 15, 14, 16]. Complex methods are then required to provide reasonable forecasts of the epidemic evolution [2, 11, 1, 8] and avoid unreliable predictions, which make people worry (on this point, see e.g.…”