2007
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2007.379061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Uncertainty of Correlated Quantities - Comparison of Two Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for system parameters, the same as in examples I-IV, are presented in Table. It can be observed that despite uncertainty calculations using matrix A are approximate [1,9], they match with experimental values. U q (X(1) Re ) = 6.10 × 10 …”
Section: Examples Of Uncertainty Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Results for system parameters, the same as in examples I-IV, are presented in Table. It can be observed that despite uncertainty calculations using matrix A are approximate [1,9], they match with experimental values. U q (X(1) Re ) = 6.10 × 10 …”
Section: Examples Of Uncertainty Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The correctness of (19) was proven in a similar fashion, but in this case, digital sine samples were calculated using the algorithm shown in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Experimental Verification Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error δ RES U was calculated as the difference between the peak-to-peak and step calibration results. The result of δ RES U measurements with one-and three-sigma error bounds calculated from (19) is shown in Fig. 15.…”
Section: Experimental Verification Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations