2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating United States Phillips curves with expectations consistent with the statistical process of inflation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of the United States, in particular, it has been said that the inability of certain activity measures to predict inflation means not necessarily that there is no relationship between usual measures of activity and future inflation, but that there is a weak relationship between the two variables which, if linear, could be associated with a small and probably unstable parameter. 1 This view is consistent with a number of studies that have reported a degree of instability in inflation model parameters for countries as diverse as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (Pagliacci and Barráez, 2010), Canada (Hostland, 1995), Colombia (Melo and Misas, 1997) and the United States (Russell and Chowdhury, 2013). …”
supporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the case of the United States, in particular, it has been said that the inability of certain activity measures to predict inflation means not necessarily that there is no relationship between usual measures of activity and future inflation, but that there is a weak relationship between the two variables which, if linear, could be associated with a small and probably unstable parameter. 1 This view is consistent with a number of studies that have reported a degree of instability in inflation model parameters for countries as diverse as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (Pagliacci and Barráez, 2010), Canada (Hostland, 1995), Colombia (Melo and Misas, 1997) and the United States (Russell and Chowdhury, 2013). …”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…This also goes against the findings of Stock and Watson (1999), Rudebusch and Svensson (1999) and Estrella and Fuhrer (2003), since it reflects a predictive instability in Phillips curves which, according to Clark and McCracken (2006), is not reported in these latter articles. Similarly, as noted in the Introduction, there is also evidence of instability in the parameters of some specifications for inflation in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Canada, Colombia and the United States as estimated by Hostland (1995), Melo and Misas (1997), Russell and Chowdhury (2013) and Pagliacci and Barráez (2010).…”
Section: The Low Predictive Power Of Simple Phillips Curves In Chile mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 See also Russel and Chowdhury (2013) about "modern" theories of the Phillips curve and Nason and Smith (2008) about the application of the New Keynesian Phillips curve to the USA.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En particular, para el caso de los Estados Unidos de América, se ha dicho que la falta de capacidad de ciertas medidas de actividad para predecir inflación no obedecería necesariamente a una ausencia de relación entre medidas usuales de actividad e inflación futura, sino a una relación débil entre ambas variables, que de ser lineal podría estar vinculada a un parámetro pequeño y probablemente inestable 1 . Esta visión es consistente con una serie de trabajos que han reportado cierta inestabilidad en los parámetros de modelos de inflación para países tan diversos como el Canadá (Hostland, 1995); Colombia (Melo y Misas, 1997); Estados Unidos de América (Russell y Chowdhury, 2013) y Venezuela (República Bolivariana de) (Pagliacci y Barráez, 2010).…”
unclassified