2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0255-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of adult patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Wad-madani, Sudan: derivation of local diagnostic reference levels

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to estimate patient dose in some common diagnostic X-ray examinations. Radiation doses were estimated for 307 patients in six public hospitals comprising 7 X-ray units in Wad-madani, Sudan. Entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was estimated in a three step protocol: First, X-ray unit output Y(d) was measured at a distance, d for different peak tube voltages and tube loadings (mAs). Next, incident air kerma (Ki) was calculated from Y(d) using inverse square law combined with patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible that in a large hospital with many Xray installations, as in the case of this study, radiological examinations are carried out using doses lower than the corresponding DRLs. In these cases, new dose levels can be established in a similar way as the DRLs and thereafter adopted to be used only locally, as local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs), to improve the already good practice [27]. The LDRLs suggested in this study are presented alongside the achievable median doses (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible that in a large hospital with many Xray installations, as in the case of this study, radiological examinations are carried out using doses lower than the corresponding DRLs. In these cases, new dose levels can be established in a similar way as the DRLs and thereafter adopted to be used only locally, as local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs), to improve the already good practice [27]. The LDRLs suggested in this study are presented alongside the achievable median doses (Tables 3 and 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When film/screen systems are used, the tube focus-to-patient support is replaced by the focus-to-film distance (FFD), as indicated in Eq. (1b ) [54] :…”
Section: Calculating the Focal-spot-to-surface Distancementioning
confidence: 99%