2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of age using aspartic acid racemisation in human dentin in Indian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between the different sexes and Asp racemization rates in the cartilage tissues and this finding is in accordance with the dentin study . However, our results contradict with the results of the studies performed using femur and alveolar bone .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In our study, we demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between the different sexes and Asp racemization rates in the cartilage tissues and this finding is in accordance with the dentin study . However, our results contradict with the results of the studies performed using femur and alveolar bone .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Nevertheless, unlike bone, dental tissues have more closed systems and hence, the influence of other physiological processes is not as immediate as in bone (Foster et al, ; Griffin, Moody, Penkman, & Collins, ). Thus, biomarkers like aspartic racemization (e.g., Rajkumari, Nirmal, Sunil, & Smith, ) and tooth cementum annulations (TCA) (e.g., Wittwer‐Backofen, ) have been found to bear a closer relationship with CA. Therefore, these types of biomarkers have the potential to have greater applicability for the measurement or estimation of CA rather than BA, because their nature makes them less susceptible to variability with aging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajkumari et al . [ 27 ] conducted a study on buccolingual longitudinal sections of 36 maxillary and mandibular premolar from Indian participants with an age range of 11–70 years. They estimated age between the ranges of ± 3 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%