2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of carrying capacity in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)

Abstract: For plant populations, carrying capacity is the maximum number or biomass of a species that can be sustained under finite site resources on a long-term basis. This study was aimed at estimating the carrying capacity in planted stands of loblolly pine. Maximum stand basal area (BA) that can be sustained over a long period of time can be regarded as a measure of carrying capacity. To quantify and project stand BA carrying capacity, one approach is to use the estimate from a fitted cumulative BA-age equation; ano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining annual fertilization with multiple herbicide applications for young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands gave mean annual increments averaging 27 m 3 •ha −1 •year −1 that rival the 26 m 3 •ha −1 •year −1 achieved in exotic environments such as in Hawaii (Harms et al 2000;Borders and Bailey 2001). In terms of the carrying capacity-the maximum number (or biomass) of a plant that can be sustained on a long-term basis under finite site resources (Yang and Burkhart 2017)--a loblolly pine plantation on a dry site in Georgia was reported to reach a maximum basal area of 48 m 2 •ha −1 with annual fertilizer additions and weed control treatments (Jokela et al 2004); note that a loblolly pine plantation in Hawaii can achieve levels (100 m 2 •ha −1 ) twice that value (Harms et al 2000;Samuelson et al 2010Samuelson et al , 2013. Accordingly, while impressive productivity gains for loblolly pine have been achieved on mainland plantations, exotic environments (e.g., Hawaii) still have higher carrying capacities, attributable to favorable climate/environmental conditions such as mild year-long temperatures, longer day lengths, and low evaporative demand (Harms et al 2000;Samuelson et al 2010Samuelson et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Combining annual fertilization with multiple herbicide applications for young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands gave mean annual increments averaging 27 m 3 •ha −1 •year −1 that rival the 26 m 3 •ha −1 •year −1 achieved in exotic environments such as in Hawaii (Harms et al 2000;Borders and Bailey 2001). In terms of the carrying capacity-the maximum number (or biomass) of a plant that can be sustained on a long-term basis under finite site resources (Yang and Burkhart 2017)--a loblolly pine plantation on a dry site in Georgia was reported to reach a maximum basal area of 48 m 2 •ha −1 with annual fertilizer additions and weed control treatments (Jokela et al 2004); note that a loblolly pine plantation in Hawaii can achieve levels (100 m 2 •ha −1 ) twice that value (Harms et al 2000;Samuelson et al 2010Samuelson et al , 2013. Accordingly, while impressive productivity gains for loblolly pine have been achieved on mainland plantations, exotic environments (e.g., Hawaii) still have higher carrying capacities, attributable to favorable climate/environmental conditions such as mild year-long temperatures, longer day lengths, and low evaporative demand (Harms et al 2000;Samuelson et al 2010Samuelson et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For a given stand, the slope parameter may also differ at different ages due to inconsistent diameter and height growth rates [21,32,33]. Moreover, there have also been some reports that indicate that the maximum stand carrying capacity is related to climate change [2,34,35] and thus varies depending on site conditions [1,36,37]. For a given tree species, in addition, different data and methods used to obtain this parameter may lead to variable values of the slope parameter [19,20,29,[38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐thinning in forests is caused by limited resources, including light and growing space (Pretzsch & Biber, 2005). The number of trees decreases when the available resources cannot meet the normal demands of growing trees (Vospernik & Sterba, 2015; Yang & Burkhart, 2017). Reineke's stand density index is based on a linear relationship between the logarithm of the stand density and the logarithm of the mean diameter, and the slope of the linear model is −1.605 (Reineke, 1933).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%