2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of dry-cured ham composition using dielectric time domain reflectometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon also occurs between unfrozen and frozen-thawed raw data in this experiment, although it is more evident above 1.2 ns ( Figure 5 ). As stated by Fulladosa et al [ 55 ], this region is related to changes in the salt content, which would explain why this region, although presenting differences in the raw data, does not have a big contribution in the model to discriminate between fresh and frozen-thawed tuna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon also occurs between unfrozen and frozen-thawed raw data in this experiment, although it is more evident above 1.2 ns ( Figure 5 ). As stated by Fulladosa et al [ 55 ], this region is related to changes in the salt content, which would explain why this region, although presenting differences in the raw data, does not have a big contribution in the model to discriminate between fresh and frozen-thawed tuna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, the LV1 of the model ( Figure 4 ) shows that the region between 0.61 ns and 1.17 ns, with a peak at 0.76 ns, has the greatest contribution for the model, and so to distinguish between unfrozen and thawed tuna samples. According to Fulladosa et al [ 55 ], changes in the signal due to the water content of the sample are mainly expected to be found on the rising edge of the step function, which is located in the region between 0.6 ns and 0.8 ns ( Figure 5 ). This suggests that the sensor is sensitive to the water loss suffered during the freezing-thawing process and that the model is using the water content differences to classify between unfrozen and frozen-thawed samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examples include structural analysis [ 27 , 28 ], water quality monitoring [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], and medical applications [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Aside from research considering quality classification of fresh [ 38 , 39 ] and cured meats [ 40 , 41 ], there is little evidence of microwave sensors making a significant impact in the food industry. This point is supported by a recent comprehensive review of electromagnetic wave sensors (from radio frequencies to X-ray) conducted by Damez and Clerjon [ 42 ].…”
Section: Microwave Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the main drawbacks of TDR is that in the microwave frequency, the dielectric properties of the food products are closely related to their composition (Bohigas et al, 2008;Bohigas & Tejada, 2009;Fulladosa et al, 2013) which could mask the relationship between the dielectric properties and the texture of the product. Furthermore, TDR is an invasive technology since the measurements are taken with a sensor that is in close contact with the sample.…”
Section: Drawbacks Of the Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…extracted fromFulladosa et al (2013), shows the normalized reflected TDR signal versus time obtained from samples of dry-cured ham with different ranges of water content. The slope and the plateau of the different curves can be observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%