2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2018-99
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of effective porosity in large-scale groundwater models by combining particle tracking, auto-calibration and <sup>14</sup>C dating

Abstract: Abstract. Effective porosity plays an important role in contaminant management. However, the effective porosity is often assumed constant in space and hence either neglected or simplified in transport model calibration. Based on a calibrated highly parametrized flow model, a three-dimensional advective transport model (MODPATH) of a 1300 km is improved significantly by the calibration of seven porosity units by a reduction of ME of 99% and RMS of 82% compared to a uniform porosity approach. Groundwater ages ra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributed net recharge was available from the Danish national water resource model (Henriksen et al, ). In contrast to the previous studies (Meyer et al, , ) no groundwater abstraction was implemented since abstraction has not taken place in most of the historical periods considered here. Rivers and drains were implemented as head‐dependent flux boundaries with estimated conductances of 21.3 (m 2 /d)/m and 0.45 (m 2 /d)/m 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Distributed net recharge was available from the Danish national water resource model (Henriksen et al, ). In contrast to the previous studies (Meyer et al, , ) no groundwater abstraction was implemented since abstraction has not taken place in most of the historical periods considered here. Rivers and drains were implemented as head‐dependent flux boundaries with estimated conductances of 21.3 (m 2 /d)/m and 0.45 (m 2 /d)/m 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The samples were analyzed for major ions in the analytical laboratory at GEUS in Copenhagen, Denmark. Of these, 18 were also analyzed for δ 13 C ‰ VPBD and 14 C at the AGH University of Science and Technology in Kraków and the Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland (details on radiocarbon dating and the correction terms that had been applied to derive groundwater ages can be found in Meyer et al, ).…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the reduction in uncertainty is relatively limited, indicating that the current dataset does not provide sufficient information for the inverse parameter estimation. Adding more and different observations would likely help to better constrain the parameter estimation (Bravo et al ; Anderson ; Anderson et al ; Colombani et al ; Meyer et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned structural error (Doherty and Welter ; Ferré ), measurement type and noise can also influence the calibrated heterogeneity in the K field (Poeter and Hill ; Doherty ; among others) and consequently different pathline distributions can be obtained. Apart from measured hydraulic heads, other observations such as temperature, solute concentrations, and flux observations could also be used as a means to constrain the estimates of groundwater model parameters (Bravo et al ; Anderson ; Anderson et al ; Colombani et al ; Meyer et al ). It can be speculated that adding more and different observations will help to better constrain the parameter estimation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%