2018
DOI: 10.31803/tg-20180830160131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of electronic programme guide use behaviour based on the switching cost evaluation

Abstract: In this article we define a new technology acceptance research model which considers the comparison of two technology solutions that an individual can use. The model estimates the usage of the observed solution based on the cost of switching from the reference solution (typically a standard or older solution) to the observed solution, considering the fact that the cost of switching is caused by a difference of facilitating conditions, habit and the intention to use between the reference and observed solutions.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the voluntariness of use in UTAUT2 dropped as a moderator because consumer behavior is voluntary in many situations (Venkatesh et al, 2012). UTAUT2 is acquiring impetus concerning investigating IS/IT adoption and dispersion-related issues, resulting in a fast increase in its credentials as the variance explained by BI increased from 56% in the UTAUT model to 74% in the UTAUT2 model, and for UB in UTAUT2, the variance explained was 56% as compared to 40% variance explained by UTAUT on the same data set (Frank and Milkovic, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the voluntariness of use in UTAUT2 dropped as a moderator because consumer behavior is voluntary in many situations (Venkatesh et al, 2012). UTAUT2 is acquiring impetus concerning investigating IS/IT adoption and dispersion-related issues, resulting in a fast increase in its credentials as the variance explained by BI increased from 56% in the UTAUT model to 74% in the UTAUT2 model, and for UB in UTAUT2, the variance explained was 56% as compared to 40% variance explained by UTAUT on the same data set (Frank and Milkovic, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%