2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1011-1344(02)00360-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of energy of the upper electron-excited states of the bacterial bioluminescent emitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five mechanisms are discussed: (1) change of electron-excited states' population and energy transfer processes in the presence of exogenous molecular energy acceptors; (2) change of the efficiency of S-T conversion in bioluminescent emitter in the presence of external heavy-halogen-substituted compounds; (3) change of rates of coupled enzymatic redox reactions under exposure to oxidizers; (4) interactions of hydrophobic and/or halogensubstituted compounds with enzymes and variation, by this, the enzymatic activity; and (5) non-specific effects of electron acceptors. The effects of different groups of exogenous compounds-organic dyes (Nemtseva and Kudryasheva 2007;Kudryasheva et al 2004;2003b), oxidizers (Vetrova et al 2009;2007;, halogen-substituted molecules (Kirillova et al 2011;Kirillova and Kudryasheva 2007;Gerasimova and Kudryasheva 2002;Kudryasheva et al 2002b), and salts of stable and radioactive metals Kamnev et al 2013;Tarasova et al 2012;Alexandrova et al 2011;Rozhko et al 2007;Kudryasheva et al 1999 b;1996) are discussed according to the classification suggested.…”
Section: Environmental Toxicity Monitoring and Bacterial Bioluminescementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five mechanisms are discussed: (1) change of electron-excited states' population and energy transfer processes in the presence of exogenous molecular energy acceptors; (2) change of the efficiency of S-T conversion in bioluminescent emitter in the presence of external heavy-halogen-substituted compounds; (3) change of rates of coupled enzymatic redox reactions under exposure to oxidizers; (4) interactions of hydrophobic and/or halogensubstituted compounds with enzymes and variation, by this, the enzymatic activity; and (5) non-specific effects of electron acceptors. The effects of different groups of exogenous compounds-organic dyes (Nemtseva and Kudryasheva 2007;Kudryasheva et al 2004;2003b), oxidizers (Vetrova et al 2009;2007;, halogen-substituted molecules (Kirillova et al 2011;Kirillova and Kudryasheva 2007;Gerasimova and Kudryasheva 2002;Kudryasheva et al 2002b), and salts of stable and radioactive metals Kamnev et al 2013;Tarasova et al 2012;Alexandrova et al 2011;Rozhko et al 2007;Kudryasheva et al 1999 b;1996) are discussed according to the classification suggested.…”
Section: Environmental Toxicity Monitoring and Bacterial Bioluminescementioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 ± 55 In particular, the energy transfer to exogenous molecules introduced in the bioluminescent reaction has been attempted. 53,54 Fluorescent aromatic molecules with energies of the first singlet excited state in the range of 22 000 ± 32 000 cm 71 (i.e., higher than the analogous energy of the emitter molecule) have been used as the exogenous molecules (potential acceptors of excitation energy). Note that the absorption spectra of the chosen molecules did not overlap with the bioluminescence spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the sensitised luminescence was detected only for compounds with an energy of the fluorescent state of not more than 26 000 cm 71 , this energy was taken as the characteristics of the upper electron-excited state of the bacterial bioluminescence emitter. 54 A study of the fluorescence anisotropy decay of the acceptor molecules in the presence of bacterial luciferase proved the possibility of hydrophobic binding of acceptor molecules to luciferase, and, hence, these molecules can approach the emitter to distances appropriate for energy transfer by the exchange mechanism. 55 The last mechanism of bacterial bioluminescence to be mentioned was proposed by McCapra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that this eliminated any excited carbonyl product playing the role of the HEI. However, these parinaldehydes have their lowest energy absorption band maximum at 320 nm, exceeding the energy limit for sensitization by the effective dyes used by Kudreyasheva and coworkers (189). Fluorescence anisotropy did not indicate specific association of the sensitizing dyes with Lux, so the authors speculated that the excitation mechanism was through a collisional complex (77,190).…”
Section: The High Energy Intermediatementioning
confidence: 91%