2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of extreme significant wave heights and the associated uncertainties: A case study using NORA10 hindcast data for the Barents Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the same studies have shown that the change in extreme wave heights is marginal. The areas where the change is more significant are those of the northern parts of Barents Sea, Kara, and Chukchi Seas, whereas, in areas where the sea is already ice free during September and October, like the North Atlantic and the main part of the Barents Sea, extreme waves would be less frequently witnessed and great changes in extreme wave heights could not be expected [7]. In conclusion, the eastern Arctic regions and areas close to the north Canadian coasts will be influenced most by the absence of the ice [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the same studies have shown that the change in extreme wave heights is marginal. The areas where the change is more significant are those of the northern parts of Barents Sea, Kara, and Chukchi Seas, whereas, in areas where the sea is already ice free during September and October, like the North Atlantic and the main part of the Barents Sea, extreme waves would be less frequently witnessed and great changes in extreme wave heights could not be expected [7]. In conclusion, the eastern Arctic regions and areas close to the north Canadian coasts will be influenced most by the absence of the ice [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After fitting the parameters to the candidate distribution for each approach, estimates of the significant wave height were calculated for 50-and 100-year return periods by Equations (6), (8), and (10). Additionally, values were calculated also for the 23-year return period, which was equal to the duration of the underlying database, thus rendering the calculated extreme value comparable to the maximum recorded H s .…”
Section: Extreme Significant Wave Height Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the POT approach, the average number of peaks per year (calculated as 4.3 peaks-per-year) used in Equations (10) and (11) for extrapolation created an assumption that storms occurred uniformly spaced in time, which is obviously not true. The variance of the between-storms duration period could be reported in future work to illustrate this uncertainty source.…”
Section: Tr [Years]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive understanding of the ocean surface waves arising from extreme weather conditions is of great interest to coastal and ocean engineers and oceanographers. Many studies about predicting, simulating, or hindcasting typhoon-generated storm waves and storm surges have been carried out through numerical models because wave buoys cannot be deployed throughout an entire marine area [10][11][12][13][14]. A third-generation spectral wind wave model is mainly driven by wind fields and has been widely used to predict, simulate, and hindcast wave heights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%